Trump’s Call to Ditch Quarterly Reports: Will Semi-Annual Disclosures Benefit Investors?

Trump proposes ending quarterly reports, pushing for semi-annual ones to boost long-term focus. SEC approval needed.
Donald Trump stands against a bright blue sky, pointing directly at the camera Donald Trump stands against a bright blue sky, pointing directly at the camera
President Donald Trump points as he prepares to board Air Force One at RAF Lossiemouth, Scotland, at the conclusion of his trip. By Brian Jason / Shutterstock.com.

Executive Summary

  • President Donald Trump has endorsed a shift for U.S. public companies from quarterly to semi-annual financial reporting, aiming to combat short-term corporate thinking and encourage long-term strategic focus.
  • The proposed change, which requires SEC approval, is supported by some industry figures and international precedents, with proponents arguing it would reduce regulatory burdens and costs.
  • Concerns exist that semi-annual reporting could reduce the timeliness of crucial economic and business insights, potentially exaggerating stock market fluctuations and hindering early detection of economic trends.
  • The Story So Far

  • The advocacy for public companies to shift from quarterly to semi-annual financial reporting is driven by a belief, championed by President Trump and others, that current practices promote “short-term corporate thinking” at the expense of long-term strategic goals. This proposed change aims to alleviate regulatory burdens and save costs, drawing parallels with international precedents in the EU and UK, and aligning with an existing industry push for such a reform.
  • Why This Matters

  • President Trump’s push for public companies to move from quarterly to semi-annual financial reporting aims to foster a long-term strategic focus for Corporate America and reduce regulatory burdens, potentially encouraging more companies to go public. However, this shift risks significantly delaying crucial insights for investors and economists into business performance and broader economic trends, which could diminish market transparency and potentially exaggerate stock market fluctuations.
  • Who Thinks What?

  • President Donald Trump and proponents of semi-annual financial reporting argue that ceasing quarterly disclosures would combat short-term corporate thinking, save money, allow management to focus on long-term strategic goals, and reduce regulatory burdens on public companies.
  • Conversely, shareholders, economists, and policymakers express concern that a shift to semi-annual reporting would delay critical and timely insights into economic trends and company performance, potentially exaggerating stock market fluctuations.
  • President Donald Trump has endorsed a significant overhaul of U.S. financial reporting, advocating for public companies to cease quarterly financial disclosures in favor of semi-annual reports. This proposed shift, announced via a Truth Social post, aims to combat short-term corporate thinking and allow management to focus on long-term strategic goals, though it could also reduce the timeliness of insights into the business world and the broader economy.

    Trump’s Rationale

    In his social media statement, Trump argued that companies “should no longer be forced to ‘Report’ on a quarterly basis” and instead adopt a six-month reporting cycle. He asserted that such a change would “save money, and allow managers to focus on properly running their companies,” contrasting U.S. practices with what he described as China’s “50 to 100 year view on management of a company.”

    This criticism of “quarterly capitalism” and its promotion of short-term thinking echoes sentiments previously expressed by prominent figures such as JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon and investor Warren Buffett. Even Hillary Clinton, Trump’s 2016 presidential opponent, voiced deep distress about the practice in 2016.

    Proponents of semi-annual reporting argue that it would encourage Corporate America to prioritize long-term challenges and opportunities over immediate stock market reactions. Additionally, some suggest that the regulatory burdens associated with quarterly reporting have contributed to a decline in the number of public companies in the United States.

    Regulatory Path and Industry Support

    Trump acknowledged that any such change would be “subject to SEC Approval,” referring to the necessary regulatory sign-off from the Securities and Exchange Commission. This is not the first time Trump has urged the SEC to consider this shift; in 2018, he called on the agency to study a move to a six-month reporting system to “allow greater flexibility & save money.”

    The Long-Term Stock Exchange, an exchange backed by major investors including Andreessen Horowitz and Founders Fund, is reportedly preparing to petition the SEC to eliminate the quarterly earnings report requirement. Bill Harts, CEO of the Long-Term Stock Exchange, told The Wall Street Journal that the idea of moving away from quarterly reporting “has come” given the perceived burdens of being a public company.

    Internationally, regulators in both the European Union and the United Kingdom ceased requiring quarterly results in the 2010s, adopting six-month reporting periods instead.

    Analyst Outlook and Potential Hurdles

    Jaret Seiberg, managing director at TD Cowen Washington Research Group, noted that the switch to semi-annual reporting has moved “from improbable to probable though not guaranteed.” Seiberg highlighted an existing industry push for this change and the inclination of SEC Chair Paul Atkins, a Trump nominee, to reduce regulatory red tape. He suggested this could be “an easy policy win for SEC Chair Paul Atkins to deliver to the President.”

    However, implementing such a change would require time, with SEC staffers likely needing at least six months to craft a proposed rule and gather supporting data.

    Concerns About Timeliness

    Despite the arguments for longer-term focus, a move away from quarterly reporting raises concerns among shareholders, economists, and policymakers who rely on timely updates from major companies. Quarterly reports provide critical insights into economic trends, such as shifts in travel demand from airlines, early warnings on loan losses from banks, and current updates on the artificial intelligence boom from Big Tech firms.

    Shifting to a six-month reporting period could delay these vital insights, potentially exaggerating stock market fluctuations during periods of economic or industry change.

    Add a comment

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Secret Link