Executive Summary
The Story So Far
Why This Matters
Who Thinks What?
Bitcoin and altcoins have notably failed to mirror the recent all-time highs achieved by gold and traditional stock markets this month, prompting questions about the crypto bull market’s trajectory. New research from onchain analytics platform CryptoQuant, specifically from contributor XWIN Research Japan, identifies four primary reasons for this divergence: the timing of Federal Reserve rate cuts, stablecoin liquidity dynamics, leveraged trading strategies, and historical market behavior.
Lagging Behind Traditional Assets
While gold and U.S. stock markets continue to post record highs, Bitcoin and the broader crypto market have remained stagnant or seen declines. This has led some to question whether crypto is truly becoming a mainstream asset class, but CryptoQuant suggests it’s a familiar pattern rather than a failure.
XWIN Research Japan argues that crypto is simply repeating historical patterns, typically lagging behind traditional assets in the early phases of economic shifts. They highlight that institutional capital tends to flow first into highly liquid assets like equities and gold.
The Impact of Fed Rate Cuts
According to XWIN, crypto, particularly altcoins, sits at the end of the liquidity pipeline. It only benefits when broader risk appetite expands, usually after traditional assets have absorbed initial capital flows.
The current market setup for Bitcoin and Ether mirrors patterns observed in previous cycles. XWIN noted a “front-run rally after the Fed’s rate cut, followed by a correction as liquidity failed to fully rotate into crypto.” Only after traditional assets cooled did BTC and ETH historically outperform.
Stablecoin Liquidity and Trader Behavior
Another significant factor is the state of stablecoin reserves. Although the overall stablecoin supply reached a record $308 billion this month, more stablecoins are reportedly leaving exchanges than entering them. This trend indicates a “risk-off” mentality or profit-taking among traders.
This off-exchange parking of liquidity suggests funds are being bridged, sidelined, or used in private markets rather than actively deployed to purchase Bitcoin or Ether. Additionally, data from derivatives platforms reveals a preference among traders for “hedging and leverage strategies,” which is a common response to sideways market action.
Historical Precedent: Lag, Then Leap
Despite the current underperformance, CryptoQuant’s analysis suggests that Bitcoin tends to “lag, then leap.” Historically, following equity all-time highs, Bitcoin has typically gained +12% within 30 days and +35% within 90 days.
While short-term headwinds like quantitative tightening (QT), Treasury liquidity absorption, and looming options expiries persist, the structural setup remains favorable for crypto once liquidity cycles catch up. This historical pattern suggests the current delay might be a precursor to future gains rather than an indicator of a failed bull market.