Trump’s Insurrection Act Gambit: How a 200-Year-Old Law Could Reshape Federal Power

Trump may use the Insurrection Act to deploy troops, potentially overriding local officials during anti-ICE protests.
President Donald Trump speaks at a press briefing. President Donald Trump speaks at a press briefing.
President Donald Trump speaks at a press briefing to announce the invocation of the Home Act. By Joey Sussman / Shutterstock.com.

Executive Summary

  • President Trump has indicated a willingness to invoke the Insurrection Act to deploy US troops to cities to quell “criminal insurrection,” potentially over the objections of local officials.
  • The Insurrection Act allows the President to deploy US troops domestically under specific circumstances to enforce federal authority, overriding the general restrictions of the Posse Comitatus Act.
  • While typically invoked at a state’s request, the Insurrection Act has historical precedent for unilateral presidential invocation, as seen with Presidents Eisenhower and Kennedy during the school integration era.
  • The Story So Far

  • The Insurrection Act is a federal law permitting the deployment of U.S. troops domestically under specific, limited circumstances, generally overriding the Posse Comitatus Act. While typically invoked at a state’s request, the President can unilaterally deploy forces if “unlawful obstructions” or “rebellion against the authority of the United States” make it impracticable to enforce federal laws, a power that has historical precedent with presidents like Eisenhower and Kennedy overriding state governors to enforce federal authority.
  • Why This Matters

  • President Trump’s escalating rhetoric regarding “insurrection” and his potential unilateral invocation of the Insurrection Act signal a significant shift towards increased federal intervention in domestic unrest, potentially deploying US troops to cities even over the objections of local officials. This move could fundamentally challenge the traditional balance of power between federal and state/local governments in managing civil disturbances, raising concerns about the erosion of local control and the role of the military in domestic law enforcement.
  • Who Thinks What?

  • President Donald Trump views anti-ICE protests as “insurrection” and is willing to invoke the Insurrection Act to deploy US troops to cities, even over the objections of local officials, to enforce federal authority.
  • Local officials, including governors and mayors, are implied to be resisting federal intervention, as President Trump’s consideration of the Insurrection Act includes acting “over the objections of local officials” if they were “holding us up.”
  • President Donald Trump has increasingly used the term “insurrection” to describe anti-ICE protests, particularly in Portland, and has indicated a willingness to potentially invoke the Insurrection Act. This federal law would allow him to deploy US troops to cities, even over the objections of local officials, to enforce federal authority and quell what he characterizes as “criminal insurrection.”

    The Insurrection Act Explained

    The Insurrection Act, first passed in 1792 and last amended in 1871, permits the deployment of US troops within the country under specific, limited circumstances. It functions in conjunction with the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, which generally restricts the use of the military for domestic law enforcement.

    President Trump stated that the act exists “for a reason” and indicated he would use it if “people were being killed, and courts were holding us up, or governors or mayors were holding us up.” His aide, Stephen Miller, also referred to a judge’s order barring National Guard deployment in Portland as “legal insurrection,” asserting an effort to “delegitimize the core function of the federal government.”

    How the Act is Invoked

    Typically, the Insurrection Act is invoked at the request of a state’s governor or legislature. A notable instance occurred in 1992 when President George H.W. Bush deployed federal troops to Los Angeles following riots, at the request of then-California Governor Pete Wilson.

    However, President Trump suggested he could unilaterally invoke the act without local consent. The law states that a president may call federal service militia and use armed forces if they “considers that unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion against the authority of the United States, make it impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States in any State by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings.”

    Historical Precedent for Unilateral Action

    There is historical precedent for presidents invoking the Insurrection Act over the objections of state governors. Presidents Dwight Eisenhower and John F. Kennedy both utilized the act to enforce federal authority during the school integration era, overriding governors who resisted desegregation orders. Eisenhower, for example, deployed the 101st Airborne Division to Little Rock, Arkansas, after standing down the Arkansas National Guard.

    The Brennan Center for Justice at New York University has documented 30 past invocations of the Insurrection Act, illustrating its historical application in various domestic crises.

    President Trump’s increased rhetoric regarding “insurrection” and his contemplation of invoking the Insurrection Act underscore a potential shift towards greater federal intervention in domestic unrest, even in the face of local resistance from governors and mayors.

    Add a comment

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Secret Link