Can EU’s Trade Deal with India Survive the Basmati Rice Dispute?

EU-India trade talks face hurdle: Basmati rice GI. Pakistan opposes India’s claim; EU seeks resolution.
A composite image showing the flags of the European Union and India joined together by a diagonal line. A composite image showing the flags of the European Union and India joined together by a diagonal line.
A visual representation of the flags of the European Union and India, symbolizing cooperation and political ties. By MDL.

Executive Summary

  • The European Union’s comprehensive trade deal with India is significantly challenged by an unresolved dispute over the Geographical Indication (GI) of basmati rice between India and Pakistan.
  • Both the EU and India are under pressure to finalize a trade agreement by the end of the year, a timeline influenced by the new tariff policies of the Trump administration.
  • The EU is entangled in the geopolitical conflict between India and Pakistan, particularly concerning territorial recognition in Kashmir, as it seeks a common resolution for the basmati GI without favoring either nation’s claim.
  • The Story So Far

  • The European Union and India are under pressure to finalize a comprehensive trade deal by year-end, a timeline reportedly influenced by new tariff policies from the Trump administration, making the resolution of contentious issues critical for both partners. A significant hurdle in these negotiations is the long-standing dispute over the geographical indication (GI) of basmati rice, with both India and Pakistan claiming exclusive rights, and Pakistan’s application notably including disputed Kashmir regions. The EU, a major global protector of GIs, is thus entangled in a complex geopolitical conflict, aiming to secure its own product protections while navigating the sensitive territorial disputes between India and Pakistan.
  • Why This Matters

  • The ongoing basmati rice geographical indication dispute is a critical hurdle for the EU and India’s comprehensive trade deal, which both blocs are keen to finalize by year-end, partly due to new tariff policies under the Trump administration. This dispute not only highlights the economic significance of GIs but also forces the EU into a delicate geopolitical balancing act between India and Pakistan over territorial claims, potentially offering Brussels leverage to compel a joint resolution beneficial for European trade interests.
  • Who Thinks What?

  • The European Union aims to finalize a comprehensive trade deal with India by the end of the year, driven by global economic shifts and the new tariff policies of the Trump administration, while seeking to protect its own geographical indications and navigate the basmati rice dispute without getting entangled in India-Pakistan territorial conflicts.
  • India seeks GI recognition for basmati rice, having unilaterally submitted an application to the European Commission, and is a key partner in the desired trade agreement with the EU.
  • Pakistan formally opposes India’s application for basmati GI, viewing it as an attempt to gain exclusive use of the term, and has submitted its own GI request that includes disputed Kashmir regions.
  • The European Union is navigating a complex diplomatic challenge in its trade negotiations with India, as a long-standing dispute over the geographical indication (GI) of basmati rice continues to pose a significant hurdle. European Commissioner for Trade Maroš Šefčovič confirmed on September 12 that the basmati issue is on the agenda, with new discussions taking place in Brussels this week. The EU and India aim to finalize a comprehensive trade deal by the end of the year, a timeline reportedly influenced by the new tariff policies of the Trump administration, which are pushing both partners to strengthen trade ties.

    Trade Deal Imperative

    The urgency to secure a trade agreement between the EU and India has been heightened by global economic shifts. Both blocs are under pressure to establish new trade relationships, making the resolution of contentious issues like basmati rice’s origin critical for the broader deal, which encompasses areas from automotive markets to public procurement.

    The Stakes of Geographical Indications

    Geographical Indications are economically significant, designed to protect products whose quality or reputation is linked to their place of origin. The EU, with its rich artisanal and culinary heritage, holds the largest number of GIs globally, largely due to products from France, Italy, and Spain. In trade talks, Brussels seeks to protect its own products, such as French champagne and Italian Parmigiano Reggiano cheese, from counterfeiting in partner countries, while also acknowledging the GI interests of its trading partners.

    A History of Joint Efforts and Division

    Initially, India and Pakistan collaborated to protect basmati rice. In the late 1990s, they successfully challenged a US company, RiceTec, which had obtained a patent on basmati. This led to the revocation of the patent by the US Patent and Trademark Office in 2001. Subsequently, from 2004 to 2008, both nations worked together on a joint application to the European Commission for GI recognition, acknowledging their shared heritage over the rice from the Punjab region.

    However, these joint efforts collapsed following the 2008 Mumbai attacks, which India attributed to Pakistani intelligence services. After years of deadlock, India unilaterally submitted a request for GI registration to the European Commission in 2018. The application described basmati as grown in the Indo-Gangetic plains, a region shared by India, Pakistan, Cambodia, and Nepal, including Punjab.

    Pakistan formally opposed India’s application, viewing it as an attempt to gain exclusive use of the “basmati” term. After unsuccessful legal exchanges, Pakistan submitted its own GI request in 2023. This application notably included four districts of the disputed Kashmir region—Mirpur, Bhimber, Poonch, and Bagh—as basmati-growing areas.

    EU’s Geopolitical Conundrum

    The EU finds itself entangled in the broader geopolitical conflict between India and Pakistan, particularly concerning the territorial recognition of Kashmir. Matteo Mariano, a trademarks expert at Novagraaf law firm, noted that the Commission has avoided a “first come, first served” approach, choosing not to involve itself in the territorial disputes between the two nations.

    While sources from both India and Pakistan deny seeking exclusive recognition for basmati, a common resolution remains elusive. The EU’s trade negotiations, which are extensive and cover a wide array of goods and services, are complicated by this sensitive issue.

    Leveraging Trade for Resolution

    Mariano suggested that the European Commission could potentially leverage the importance of the trade agreement for India to compel a joint registration by both India and Pakistan. This strategy would depend on the EU’s willingness to use the GI negotiations as a bargaining chip, potentially benefiting European companies by securing concessions from India. Commissioner Šefčovič has described Indian negotiators as “tough,” indicating the diplomatic skill required to navigate this complex issue.

    Add a comment

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Secret Link