Millions March: How “No Kings” Rallies Confronted Trump’s Agenda and Fueled a Fight for Democracy

Millions protested Trump’s “authoritarian” agenda in “No Kings” rallies across the U.S., opposing democracy threats, policies.
A protester holds a pink "NO KINGS!" sign with a US flag at a crowded May Day political rally in Los Angeles. A protester holds a pink "NO KINGS!" sign with a US flag at a crowded May Day political rally in Los Angeles.
A demonstrator at a May Day protest in Los Angeles holds a sign against President Trump. By Matt Gush / Shutterstock.com.

Executive Summary

  • Nearly 7 million people participated in over 2,700 “No Kings” rallies nationwide, protesting President Trump’s “authoritarian” agenda and significantly surpassing previous demonstrations.
  • The protests focused on core concerns including perceived threats to American democracy, erosion of free speech, aggressive immigration policies, and cuts to federal programs like healthcare.
  • Organized by groups such as the Indivisible Project, the rallies were largely peaceful and highlighted a broad public sentiment of concern regarding the direction of the country under the Trump administration.
  • The Story So Far

  • The widespread “No Kings” protests against President Donald Trump’s “authoritarian” agenda were primarily driven by deep concerns over perceived threats to American democracy, including the erosion of free speech and the expansion of executive power. Additionally, demonstrators were motivated by opposition to the administration’s immigration policies, such as mass raids and federal troop deployments, and fears over cuts to federal programs like healthcare, all set against a backdrop of a federal government shutdown and political stalemates.
  • Why This Matters

  • The widespread “No Kings” protests, involving millions across the U.S., signify a substantial and growing public opposition to President Trump’s perceived authoritarian agenda, with deep concerns over threats to democracy, free speech, immigration policies, and federal program cuts. This large-scale mobilization across various states suggests a highly engaged electorate whose alarm over these issues could significantly shape future political discourse and electoral outcomes.
  • Who Thinks What?

  • Organizers of the “No Kings” rallies, along with millions of participants and public figures like Bill Nye and John Cusack, believe President Trump’s actions pose an authoritarian threat to American democracy, free speech, and fundamental rights, citing concerns over expanding executive power, dismantling democratic institutions, immigration crackdowns, and cuts to federal programs.
  • Democratic Senators, such as Raphael Warnock and Bernie Sanders, align with the protest sentiments, emphasizing that power resides with the people and linking the administration’s policies to broader issues of economic inequality, the “destruction” of public services, and the “demonization” of federal employees.
  • Millions of people across the United States participated in over 2,700 “No Kings” rallies on Saturday, October 19, 2025, protesting against what organizers described as President Donald Trump’s “authoritarian” agenda. The nationwide demonstrations, which saw nearly 7 million attendees, focused on concerns over threats to democracy, free speech, immigration policies, and cuts to federal programs.

    Protest Turnout and Scope

    The rallies took place in major cities like New York, where over 100,000 people gathered, as well as in smaller towns and along busy thoroughfares across both red and blue states. This round of protests significantly surpassed previous gatherings in June, which saw approximately 5 million people protest the Trump administration during a military parade in Washington.

    Organized by the Indivisible Project, the events were largely peaceful, though isolated incidents of individuals targeting protesters were reported. Organizers stated their commitment to nonviolent action, having trained tens of thousands in safety and de-escalation methods amidst growing political violence.

    Democracy at Stake

    A central theme for many demonstrators was the perceived threat to American democracy. Protesters voiced fears that President Trump’s actions were dismantling democratic institutions and expanding executive power.

    Peggy Cole, a retired government worker who traveled from Michigan to Washington, D.C., for the protest, expressed concern that Trump was “taking our government, our democracy, and dismantling it piece by piece.” Similarly, a New York protester, who asked not to be named, highlighted that unlike past movements focused on expanding rights, current efforts are aimed at preventing the erosion of fundamental democratic tenets like the press and the judiciary.

    In Atlanta, Democratic Sen. Raphael Warnock emphasized that the message of the protests was clear: “This is not about the people in power, it’s about the power in the people.” Kimberly Diemert, an organizer for the Georgia chapter of 50501, reminded the crowd of Atlanta’s legacy as the “cradle of the Civil Rights Movement as well as democracy.”

    Concerns Over Free Speech

    Demonstrators also raised alarms about what they perceived as a threat to freedom of expression in the United States. Bobbie Castillo, attending her first protest in Washington, D.C., after traveling from Nebraska, noted a fear of repercussions for expressing dissent.

    Bill Nye, “The Science Guy,” speaking at the D.C. protest, asserted that Trump and his associates “cannot tolerate dissent” and were attempting to silence critics. Participants in smaller cities, such as Ashland, Oregon, described the day as a “joyful celebration of our love for America, for free speech, for the importance of community.”

    Immigration Policies and Federal Overreach

    Many attendees linked their participation to the administration’s immigration crackdown, including mass raids and the deployment of federal troops to Democratic-led cities. Protests against federal immigration enforcement had previously erupted in cities like Los Angeles and Portland.

    In Los Angeles, where federal raids triggered significant demonstrations, protesters called for immigrant rights and an end to deportation campaigns. Gilberto Beas, sitting outside LA’s City Hall, stated the protest was “a message for ICE to stop doing what they’re doing.”

    Actor John Cusack, addressing the Chicago protest, criticized the deployment of troops on city streets, stating, “No, you can’t put troops on our streets. You can’t create enough chaos to invoke the Insurrection Act so you can stay in power.”

    Cuts to Federal Programs

    Concerns about cuts to federal programs, particularly healthcare, were also a significant motivator for protesters. These rallies occurred amidst a federal government shutdown, with Republicans and the White House in a standoff with Democrats over a funding bill.

    Danielle Guinto, a mother of two at the Chicago demonstration, expressed worries about the impact of federal changes to Medicaid and rising costs of living on families. Anthony Lee, a furloughed federal worker and union president, highlighted the “destruction” of public services and the “demonization” of federal employees.

    Sen. Bernie Sanders, speaking in D.C., connected these issues to broader economic inequalities, stating, “This is about a handful of the wealthiest people on Earth who, in their insatiable greed, have hijacked our economy and our political system.”

    Key Takeaways

    The widespread “No Kings” protests underscore a broad public sentiment of concern regarding the direction of American democracy, free speech, immigration enforcement, and social welfare programs under the Trump administration. Demonstrators across the country voiced a unified call for accountability and the preservation of democratic institutions.

    Add a comment

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Secret Link