Trump-Xi Summit: Can US-China Trade Talks Break the Cycle of Tensions?

Trade talks between US and China show progress. Tensions remain over rare earths and past broken deals.
Chinese President Xi Jinping stands with an EU flag behind him Chinese President Xi Jinping stands with an EU flag behind him
Chinese President Xi Jinping, dressed in a dark suit, stands with an EU flag and ceremonial guards in the background at Villa Madama in Rome, Italy, on March 23, 2019. By Shutterstock.com / Alessia Pierdomenico.

Executive Summary

  • Financial markets responded positively to reports of smooth trade discussions leading up to an anticipated meeting between President Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping, despite ongoing tensions over China’s rare-earth mineral export restrictions.
  • Skepticism surrounds the upcoming US-China trade talks due to a history of both nations accusing each other of violating prior agreements, with the US currently investigating China’s adherence to a previous deal.
  • Amid efforts to de-escalate tensions with China, the Trump administration simultaneously heightened trade disputes with key ally Canada, which observers note could inadvertently increase America’s economic reliance on China.
  • The Story So Far

  • The anticipated meeting between President Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping occurs amidst prolonged US-China trade tensions, primarily concerning China’s strategic control and use of rare-earth minerals as leverage in negotiations. This strained relationship is further complicated by a history of both nations accusing each other of violating prior trade agreements, fostering skepticism about the longevity of any new deals, while the Trump administration simultaneously creates new trade disputes with key allies like Canada.
  • Why This Matters

  • The upcoming meeting between President Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping, while offering a temporary market reprieve, is unlikely to resolve core trade tensions, particularly concerning China’s strategic leverage over rare-earth minerals, suggesting a high probability of future restrictions and retaliatory tariffs. Furthermore, the Trump administration’s simultaneous escalation of trade disputes with key allies like Canada risks inadvertently increasing America’s economic reliance on China by alienating traditional partners, indicating a complex and potentially counterproductive global trade strategy.
  • Who Thinks What?

  • US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent indicated that the high-stakes meeting between President Trump and President Xi could result in “some kind of deferral” on China’s rare-earth export controls.
  • US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer and analysts expressed skepticism, suggesting China intends to maintain rare-earth access as leverage and that any deferral might only be temporary.
  • Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has shown reluctance to retaliate against US tariffs, while observers note that continued alienation of allies by the Trump administration could inadvertently increase America’s economic reliance on China.
  • Financial markets responded positively to weekend reports of smooth trade discussions between the United States and China, leading up to an anticipated meeting this week between President Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping. This development follows weeks of heightened tensions, during which Trump had threatened significant tariffs on Chinese exports and considered canceling the meeting.

    Ongoing Trade Tensions

    The latest escalation in US-China trade relations centers on Beijing’s plans to restrict exports of rare-earth minerals, which are crucial for a wide array of electronic devices. China has historically controlled a majority of the world’s rare-earth supply and has implemented measures to limit foreign access for over three decades.

    Following recent negotiations in Malaysia, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent indicated that the high-stakes meeting between Trump and Xi could result in “some kind of deferral” on these rare-earth export controls. However, US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, who has led the Chinese trade talks alongside Bessent, expressed skepticism, suggesting that China intends to maintain rare-earth access as leverage.

    Analysts suggest that any deferral on rare-earth controls might be temporary, allowing China to continue using these materials as leverage against US actions. This dynamic could lead to a cycle of new export restrictions from Beijing and retaliatory tariffs from the Trump administration.

    Past Agreements and Future Outlook

    Skepticism also stems from past instances where diplomatic progress has been undermined. President Trump previously enacted export controls on chip design software to China weeks after a tariff reduction deal, though these controls were later lifted. Both nations have also accused each other of violating prior trade agreements.

    Just last week, Greer initiated an investigation into whether China is adhering to a trade agreement brokered during Trump’s first term. Under that agreement, China committed to increasing purchases of American products by $200 billion by the end of 2021, a target it reportedly fell significantly short of.

    Strained Relations with Allies

    Amid efforts to de-escalate tensions with China, the Trump administration simultaneously heightened trade disputes with Canada, a key US ally and its second-largest trading partner. Trump threatened an additional 10% tariff on Canada in response to an Ontario-commissioned advertisement featuring a speech by former President Ronald Reagan on tariffs.

    Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has shown reluctance to retaliate against US tariffs, stating that “emotions don’t carry you very far.” However, observers note that continued alienation of allies could inadvertently increase America’s economic reliance on China.

    Key Takeaways

    The upcoming meeting between President Trump and President Xi is set against a complex backdrop of ongoing trade disputes, historical leverage over critical resources, and a history of both breakthroughs and breakdowns in negotiations. The administration’s approach to global trade continues to involve simultaneous de-escalation with rivals and new friction with allies.

    Add a comment

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Secret Link