Trump’s “Con Job” Strategy: Why Dismissing Economic Concerns Could Backfire

Trump’s denial of economic concerns, unlike Biden’s inflation missteps, poses a greater political risk due to public blame.
Close-up formal portrait of Donald Trump looking intently, wearing a dark suit and red tie. Close-up formal portrait of Donald Trump looking intently, wearing a dark suit and red tie.
A close-up studio portrait of President Donald Trump against a plain, dark background. By IAB Studio / Shutterstock.com.

An analysis published on November 11, 2025, by Aaron Blake suggests that President Donald Trump’s recent commentary regarding the economy, particularly his dismissal of affordability concerns, presents a more significant political challenge than President Joe Biden’s previous handling of inflation. The analysis argues that Trump’s approach, which includes characterizing economic anxieties as a “con job,” departs further from public perception compared to Biden’s administration’s earlier misjudgments.

During a Fox News interview, Trump escalated his downplaying of Americans’ affordability concerns, labeling them a “con job by Democrats” and asserting that “polls are fake.” This stance draws comparisons to President Biden’s administration, which faced political repercussions for its initial predictions about inflation.

Four years prior, President Biden and his officials repeatedly described inflation as “transitory,” implying the problem would quickly subside. Biden stated in July 2021 that price increases were not indicative of “persistent inflation,” a view that proved incorrect as the annual inflation rate climbed from approximately 5% to over 9% in the subsequent year.

However, the analysis posits that Trump’s current approach differs significantly. Rather than misjudging the persistence of inflation, Trump is described as “pretending the problem simply doesn’t exist,” directly contradicting public sentiment and various economic data points.

Political Implications

The analysis contends that while inflation and economic issues were political liabilities for President Biden, they appear to be even greater problems for Trump. This is primarily because the public is reportedly more inclined to connect current economic difficulties directly to Trump’s policies.

Recent polling data supports this assertion. A CNN poll indicated that 61% of Americans believe Trump’s policies have “worsened economic conditions,” a figure that previously peaked at 58% under Biden. Similarly, a Washington Post-ABC News poll found that 59% of Americans blamed Trump for the current inflation rate, a higher percentage than Biden received even during periods of spiking inflation.

Further polls highlight this trend: a CBS News-YouGov survey reported 64% of Americans attributing increased food and grocery prices to Trump’s policies. A Reuters-Ipsos poll from May also showed that 59% of Americans would blame Trump if the country were to enter a recession, compared to 37% who would blame Biden.

Contributing Factors

Several factors may contribute to this increased perception of Trump’s economic liability. The analysis suggests that Trump’s earlier pledges to quickly reduce prices and his decision to implement tariffs early in his second term could be contributing elements.

Additionally, President Biden’s administration may have benefited from some economic problems being attributed to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, a significant factor highlighted is the public’s view that Trump has not directly addressed affordability concerns, with 75% of Americans, including 57% of Republicans, believing his administration has not focused “not enough” on lowering prices.

In summary, the analysis suggests that President Trump’s strategy of dismissing economic concerns as a “con job” and denying the validity of polls presents a substantial political risk. This approach, which contrasts with President Biden’s past acknowledgment of misjudgments on inflation, appears to be making economic issues a more pronounced political vulnerability for Trump.

Add a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Secret Link