DoJ Files Reveal Allegations of Third-Party Trafficking in Epstein Case

New DoJ files allege Jeffrey Epstein trafficked victims to associates, contradicting previous lack of evidence claims.
Court legal documents and proceedings related to the DoJ Epstein files Court legal documents and proceedings related to the DoJ Epstein files
By MDL.

Executive Summary

  • New Allegations: Recently released DoJ files suggest Epstein trafficked victims to associates, contradicting prior official claims of insufficient evidence.
  • Specific Names: Internal memos detail allegations against figures such as Harvey Weinstein and Leon Black, though both deny involvement.
  • Prosecutorial Discrepancy: The documents reveal that federal prosecutors possessed accounts of victims being “lent out” despite public statements minimizing third-party involvement.
  • Legal Response: Attorneys for the victims assert the files confirm the existence of a wider sex-trafficking operation used to leverage powerful individuals.

Newly released Department of Justice documents suggest Jeffrey Epstein may have trafficked girls to other men, challenging previous assertions by officials that evidence was insufficient to investigate third parties. The disclosure, involving more than 3 million files, outlines specific allegations that victims were directed to engage in sexual acts with Epstein’s associates.

Among the released records is a “prosecution memorandum” dated January 26, 2021, signed by assistant US attorneys from the Southern District of New York. According to the memo, one accuser alleged that Ghislaine Maxwell directed her to massage a guest at Epstein’s home, later identified by the woman as Harvey Weinstein. The document states the woman alleged Weinstein offered her money for sex, which she accepted. Weinstein, currently incarcerated for separate sexual assault convictions, denies the claims. His representative stated that the document cites allegations rather than findings and noted Weinstein was never charged in connection with Epstein.

Financier Leon Black appears on a page titled “Prominent Names” in an FBI presentation created after July 2025. The document details allegations that Epstein directed a victim to perform sexual acts on Black. Attorneys for Black have adamantly denied any wrongdoing, citing an independent investigation by the Dechert law firm which concluded Black paid Epstein solely for tax and estate planning advice. Black has not faced criminal charges regarding his relationship with Epstein.

The files also reference other alleged associates, including deceased modeling agent Jean-Luc Brunel and Prince Andrew. Virginia Giuffre, a key accuser, alleged in civil court papers that she was trafficked to Prince Andrew, a claim the former royal has vehemently denied. Additionally, correspondence from 2023 indicates a lawyer for the Epstein estate sought FBI guidance after discovering potential child sexual abuse images involving a third party during a document review.

Attorneys representing Epstein’s victims argue these documents validate long-standing claims of a broader trafficking network. Sigrid McCawley, a partner at Boies Schiller Flexner, stated that providing young women to powerful individuals was a central component of the operation to gain leverage. Spencer Kuvin, another attorney for the victims, noted that the absence of a formal client list does not equate to a lack of third-party participation.

Investigative Oversight

The release of these internal memoranda raises significant questions regarding the scope and thoroughness of the federal investigation into Epstein’s network. While previous FBI summaries indicated that victims did not describe being “lent out” to other men, the newly public documents reveal that prosecutors were aware of specific allegations contradicting that narrative. This discrepancy highlights potential gaps in the Department of Justice’s pursuit of third-party actors involved in the trafficking ring. It is important to note that all individuals named in these files are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

Add a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Secret Link