Sentencing Scheduled for Two Women Convicted of Stalking ICE Agent in Los Angeles

Two women convicted of stalking an ICE agent in Los Angeles face up to five years in prison at their June 8 sentencing.
A sign identifies the building as a U.S. federal courthouse, photographed by David Gilder via Shutterstock. A sign identifies the building as a U.S. federal courthouse, photographed by David Gilder via Shutterstock.
Sign indicating a U.S. federal court house building. By David Gilder / Shutterstock.

Executive Summary

  • Conviction: Cynthia Raygoza and Ashleigh Brown were found guilty of stalking an ICE agent in Los Angeles.
  • Incident Details: Evidence showed the defendants followed the agent from a federal building to his home and livestreamed the event.
  • Verdict Split: Both women were acquitted of conspiracy charges, and a third defendant was fully acquitted.
  • Sentencing: A hearing is set for June 8, with the defendants facing up to five years in federal prison.

A sentencing hearing has been scheduled for June 8 for two women convicted by a federal jury of stalking a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) deportation officer in Los Angeles. Cynthia Raygoza, 38, of Riverside, and Ashleigh Brown, 38, of Aurora, Colorado, were found guilty late Friday following a weeklong trial, according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office.

Evidence presented in court demonstrated that Raygoza and Brown followed the federal agent’s vehicle from a government building in downtown Los Angeles to his private residence in Baldwin Park on August 28, 2025. Prosecutors stated that the defendants utilized Instagram accounts, including one labeled “ice_out_ofla,” to livestream their pursuit and actions to the public.

Witness testimony provided to the Los Angeles federal court indicated that upon arriving at the victim’s home, the defendants shouted at neighbors, declaring that their “neighbor is ICE” and asserting that “la migra lives here.” While the jury convicted Raygoza and Brown of stalking, they acquitted both women of a separate count of conspiring to publish protected personal information. A third defendant, Sandra Samane, was acquitted of all charges filed against her, federal prosecutors confirmed.

First Assistant U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli commented on the verdict via a statement on Facebook, noting the legal distinction between protest and harassment. “We thank the jury for bringing justice to these agitators who violated the law and endangered the safety of this federal officer and his family,” Essayli stated. “Peaceful protests are protected by the Constitution, political violence and unlawful intimidation are not.” The two convicted women each face a statutory maximum of five years in federal prison.

Judicial Process & Sentencing Guidelines

The upcoming sentencing phase will determine the specific penalties for the defendants based on federal sentencing guidelines, which assess the severity of the offense and criminal history. This case establishes a significant reference point regarding the boundaries of surveillance and harassment directed at federal law enforcement officers in off-duty capacities. It is important to note that the U.S. judicial system ensures all individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law, a standard that applied throughout the proceedings and resulted in the acquittal of the third co-defendant.

Add a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Secret Link