In a significant decision, Zambia’s Constitutional Court has ruled that former President Edgar Lungu is ineligible to run in the 2026 presidential election, having already served the maximum two terms.
The ruling, delivered unanimously by a seven-judge panel, confirms that Lungu’s partial term as president following Michael Sata’s death accounted for a full term. Consequently, Lungu’s subsequent election from 2016 to 2021 constitutes his second and final term.
Lungu, who lost the 2021 election to President Hakainde Hichilema, had announced plans for a political comeback. This court ruling, however, prevents him from contesting in future elections, a decision met with widespread interest in Zambia due to the longstanding rivalry between Lungu and Hichilema.
The court’s decision was broadcast live, emphasizing the national significance of the case. Allegations of judicial interference have surrounded this case, especially after President Hichilema dismissed three judges who had formerly ruled in favor of Lungu in a related 2016 election case. Lungu has criticized the ruling as politically manipulated.
Lungu’s term in office has been marred by corruption allegations, with charges extended to his family members. He claims these are tactics by Hichilema’s administration to sabotage his political resurgence. Meanwhile, Lungu’s party insists he remains unperturbed by the court’s decision and continues to position him as their candidate for 2026.
Zambia, notable for its substantial copper production, faces significant challenges. The nation is currently grappling with a severe drought affecting crops and endangering the food security of millions.
The Constitutional Court’s ruling marks a pivotal moment in Zambian politics, shaping the landscape for future elections. While Lungu’s political ambitions face a setback, the focus now turns towards how this decision will influence Zambia’s political arena and the citizenry’s response amid ongoing economic challenges.
Source: Apnews
