The legal proceedings surrounding a tragic double homicide case involving a Port Carbon man have taken a new turn. The defendant, Lamour Branch, was charged with the murder of two teenagers, Hunter Mock and Angelito Xavier Caraballo, in New Philadelphia. Branch’s attorney, Ashley Sabol, recently retracted a motion to change the trial venue, which had been filed due to concerns over media coverage potentially impacting jury impartiality. Although Sabol did not elaborate on the reason for the withdrawal, she indicated that a similar request might be submitted in the future.
Branch, who remains in custody at Schuylkill County Prison, was initially charged in June 2024. The charges stem from the October 2023 deaths of the two teens, found in a wooded area off Ferndale Road. Despite the media attention, the decision to retract the venue change motion marks a shift in the defense’s strategy. The original motion had suggested that the local media coverage was pervasive enough to prevent the selection of an unbiased jury in Schuylkill County.
District Attorney Michael O’Pake mentioned that the issue of jury bias is typically addressed during the jury selection process. He also stated that a pretrial conference might be scheduled soon, though no specific date has been set. In late November, after consulting with the victims’ families, O’Pake announced that the death penalty would not be pursued in this case. Branch had previously waived his right to a formal arraignment, pleading not guilty to the charges.
Branch’s legal troubles are compounded by a prior bail revocation in December, following violations of his bail conditions. During the investigation, Branch initially denied being present at the crime scene but later acknowledged his presence, asserting that another individual was responsible for the shootings. The case continues to evolve as it approaches trial, with both defense and prosecution preparing to present their evidence in Schuylkill County Court.
The Bottom Line
The developments in this case underscore the complexities of legal proceedings in high-profile cases, especially where media coverage is extensive. The decision to withdraw the request for a change of venue suggests potential confidence from the defense in the ability to secure a fair trial within the local jurisdiction, despite previous concerns.
For the community and those closely following the case, the proceedings highlight the continuous balance between ensuring justice and navigating the influences of public perception and media coverage. As the case progresses, it serves as a reminder of the judicial system’s role in addressing such serious allegations while maintaining fairness and transparency. The tragic loss of two young lives continues to resonate, prompting a collective hope for justice and peace for the victims’ families.