Can US-China Trade Talks Break the Rare-Earth Minerals Standoff? What Investors Need to Know

US-China trade talks show hope despite tensions. Rare-earth mineral control, tariffs, and unmet pledges remain.
A large container ship docked at a busy port, being serviced by gantry cranes. A large container ship docked at a busy port, being serviced by gantry cranes.
A massive container ship docked at a busy port terminal. By MDL.

Executive Summary

  • An upcoming meeting between President Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping aims to address trade disputes, particularly China’s control over rare-earth minerals, which Beijing intends to use as leverage.
  • US-China trade relations under President Trump have been marked by volatility and concerns over the reliability of agreements, including China’s failure to meet a $200 billion purchase pledge from a previous trade deal.
  • President Trump is escalating trade disputes with Canada, threatening new tariffs, which could alienate allies and potentially increase the US economy’s dependence on China.
  • The Story So Far

  • The ongoing trade discussions between the US and China are framed by China’s long-standing use of rare-earth minerals as a strategic economic lever, materials essential for electronics. This is further complicated by a history of volatile US-China trade relations under President Trump, marked by diplomatic breakthroughs quickly followed by new tensions and China’s reported failure to meet previous trade agreement pledges, such as purchasing commitments.
  • Why This Matters

  • The ongoing trade negotiations with China, particularly concerning rare-earth minerals, highlight China’s intent to maintain strategic leverage, suggesting that any deferral on export controls may only be temporary and could lead to future tariff threats from President Trump. Furthermore, the history of unfulfilled agreements raises concerns about the reliability and long-term stability of any new deals. Simultaneously, President Trump’s escalation of trade disputes with allies like Canada risks isolating the U.S. and potentially increasing its reliance on China.
  • Who Thinks What?

  • US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent anticipates “some kind of deferral” on China’s rare-earth export controls following recent discussions.
  • US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer believes China intends to continue using rare earths as leverage and has initiated an investigation into China’s adherence to past trade agreements.
  • The analysis suggests that any deferral on rare-earth controls might simply allow China to retain leverage, potentially leading to future tariff threats from President Trump, and highlights concerns about the reliability of agreements between the two nations.
  • Financial markets reacted positively to recent reports of smooth trade talks between the United States and China, despite escalating tensions that included President Trump’s threats of 100% tariffs on Chinese exports. An anticipated meeting this week between President Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping aims to address persistent trade disputes, particularly concerning China’s control over rare-earth minerals.

    Rare-Earth Minerals: A Persistent Lever

    The latest escalation in US-China trade relations stemmed from Beijing’s plans to restrict exports of rare-earth minerals, materials essential for various electronics. China has historically implemented measures to limit foreign access to these minerals, increasing safeguards as global demand has grown over the past three decades.

    US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, following weekend discussions with Chinese trade negotiators in Malaysia, expressed anticipation for “some kind of deferral” on these export controls. However, US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, a key negotiator, noted that while the US seeks to resolve the issue, China’s intent to continue using rare earths as leverage remains evident.

    Volatile Diplomacy and Unmet Pledges

    The analysis suggests that any deferral on rare-earth controls might simply allow China to retain leverage, potentially leading to future tariff threats from President Trump. The history of US-China trade relations under Trump has been marked by instances where diplomatic victories were quickly followed by new tensions, such as export controls on chip design software to China, which were later lifted.

    Furthermore, the reliability of agreements between the two nations remains a concern. US Trade Representative Greer recently initiated an investigation into China’s adherence to a trade agreement brokered during President Trump’s first term. Under that agreement, China committed to purchasing an additional $200 billion in American products by the end of 2021, a target it reportedly fell significantly short of.

    Expanding Trade Tensions Beyond China

    While efforts were made to de-escalate tensions with China, President Trump simultaneously escalated trade disputes with Canada, a major US ally and trading partner. After Ontario commissioned an advertisement featuring parts of a 1987 anti-tariff speech by President Ronald Reagan, Trump threatened an additional 10% tariff on Canadian goods.

    Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has expressed caution regarding retaliation, stating that “emotions don’t carry you very far.” The analysis suggests that alienating allies could inadvertently increase the US economy’s dependence on China.

    Outlook on Global Trade

    The intricate and often unpredictable nature of global trade relations, particularly between major economic powers, continues to shape market sentiment and international policy. The ongoing negotiations and disputes underscore the complex interplay of economic interests and geopolitical strategy.

    Add a comment

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Secret Link