China’s $42 Billion Subsidy’s “Payback”: Will Beijing’s New Strategy Revive Consumer Demand?

China‘s consumer subsidies end in 2025. Sales fall as demand wanes. Structural reforms needed for sustainable growth.
A Dell computer kiosk inside the Seg Electronics Market in Shenzhen, China, with laptops on display and Chinese flags hanging. A Dell computer kiosk inside the Seg Electronics Market in Shenzhen, China, with laptops on display and Chinese flags hanging.
Inside the Seg Electronics Market in Shenzhen, customers browse a Dell computer display. By Sorbis / Shutterstock.com.

Executive Summary

  • China’s 300 billion yuan consumer goods subsidy program, set to expire at the end of 2025, effectively boosted sales of durable goods but is now causing a “payback effect” and raising concerns about future consumption.
  • Economists project a significant decline in sales for home appliances and autos due to the “payback effect,” with retailers already experiencing plummeting sales as the subsidy’s impact fades.
  • The diminishing effect of the subsidies underscores China’s structural weakness in household demand, pressuring policymakers to implement more durable reforms like subsidizing the service sector or increasing social welfare to achieve sustainable, consumption-driven growth.
  • The Story So Far

  • China’s government introduced a substantial 300 billion yuan consumer goods subsidy program to stimulate household demand and support its targeted 5% economic growth, aiming to boost purchases of durable goods like appliances and electric vehicles. However, this program, set to expire at the end of 2025, is now generating a “payback effect” as consumers who utilized the subsidies are no longer in immediate need of new purchases, highlighting a persistent structural weakness in China’s household demand and an imbalance where consumption lags global averages while investment and exports are over-relied upon.
  • Why This Matters

  • The impending expiration of China’s 300 billion yuan consumer goods subsidy program by the end of 2025 is set to trigger a “payback effect,” causing a significant decline in durable goods sales as consumers have front-loaded purchases, thus threatening immediate economic growth targets. This situation underscores China’s persistent structural weakness in household demand, intensifying pressure on Beijing to move beyond short-term stimulus and implement more profound, sustainable reforms, such as bolstering social welfare and shifting focus to the service sector, to foster a consumption-driven economy.
  • Who Thinks What?

  • The Chinese government implemented the 300 billion yuan consumer goods subsidy program as a key policy to boost household demand and support its targeted 5% economic growth, which initially proved effective in stimulating purchases of durable goods.
  • Economists, including Larry Hu and Hannah Liu, along with local salespeople, observe that the subsidy program is now facing a “payback effect,” as consumers who have utilized the subsidies no longer need new purchases, leading to anticipated significant drops in sales and highlighting that current growth is “borrowed from the future.”
  • Economists like Robin Xing argue that the diminishing impact of these subsidies underscores China’s structural weakness in household demand, necessitating a shift towards more durable and costly reforms such as subsidizing the service sector or implementing comprehensive social welfare reforms to ensure sustainable economic growth.
  • China’s 300 billion yuan ($42 billion) consumer goods subsidy program, a key policy to boost household demand and support a targeted 5% economic growth, is set to expire at the end of 2025. While initially effective in stimulating purchases of durable goods like home appliances and electric vehicles, the scheme is now facing a “payback effect” as consumers who have already utilized the subsidies are no longer in need of new purchases, raising concerns about future consumption trends.

    Subsidies’ Impact and Fading Effect

    The subsidies, equivalent to approximately 0.2% of China’s Gross Domestic Product, have contributed an estimated 0.5 percentage point to GDP growth this year, according to Macquarie’s chief China economist, Larry Hu. This surge was evident in the first nine months of the year, with refrigerator sales spiking 48.3%, electric vehicles 34.9%, and audio-visual gadgets 26.8% compared to the same period in 2024.

    However, economists warn that this growth is borrowed from the future. Nomura’s China economist Hannah Liu noted that such policies encourage consumers to advance durable goods purchases through one-time price reductions, inevitably leading to a “payback effect.” Nomura anticipates a significant drop in sales for home appliances by around 20% year-on-year in the fourth quarter, and auto sales by 2.0%.

    This downturn is already visible on the ground. Shi Xiaolan, a salesperson in eastern Anhui province, reported her shop’s sales plummeted from 13 million yuan in June to 3 million yuan in July, with no recovery since. Cheng Sha, an air conditioner shop owner in the central city of Jingzhou, expressed concerns about store closures as the subsidy effect fades, stating that two-thirds of similar merchants in his city face a dire situation.

    Calls for Structural Reforms

    The diminishing impact of these subsidies underscores China’s persistent structural weakness in household demand. Policymakers are now pressured to consider more durable and potentially costly reforms to ensure sustainable economic growth, moving beyond short-term stimulus measures.

    Robin Xing, chief China economist at Morgan Stanley, suggests that Beijing could shift focus to subsidizing the service sector next year, using vouchers for dining, cinema, or travel. This approach, he argues, could reduce front-loading of purchases and be more effective in creating jobs due to the labor-intensive nature of services.

    Beyond immediate stimulus, there are growing calls for comprehensive social welfare reform. Xing estimates that increasing social welfare accounts for farmers and rural migrant workers to approximately 1,000 yuan per month, up from the current minimum of 143 yuan, could elevate Chinese consumption to 45% of GDP in five years from about 40% currently.

    This shift is considered crucial given that China’s household consumption lags the global average by about 20 percentage points of GDP, while its investments, primarily in infrastructure and manufacturing, are about 20 points ahead. This imbalance contributes to the economy’s over-reliance on exports, exacerbating trade tensions and fueling domestic deflation.

    Outlook for Sustainable Growth

    As China’s significant consumer goods subsidy program winds down, the immediate challenge is managing the anticipated decline in durable goods sales. The situation highlights the urgency for Beijing to implement deeper structural reforms aimed at bolstering household income and welfare, moving towards a more consumption-driven and sustainable economic model rather than relying on cyclical, short-term stimulus.

    Add a comment

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Secret Link