How Trump’s Tariffs Will Cost Global Businesses $1.2 Trillion by 2025: What You Need to Know

Trump’s tariffs may cost businesses $1.2T in 2025; consumers to bear 2/3 of the burden.
A woman with long hair pushes a shopping cart while looking intently at items displayed in a refrigerated case at a brightly lit supermarket. A woman with long hair pushes a shopping cart while looking intently at items displayed in a refrigerated case at a brightly lit supermarket.
A female customer carefully examines products in a refrigerated display case at a brightly lit grocery store. By MDL.

Executive Summary

  • S&P Global projects President Trump’s tariffs will cost global businesses over $1.2 trillion in 2025, with two-thirds of this financial burden expected to be passed onto consumers.
  • The analysis describes tariffs as “taxes on supply chains” that divert cash to governments, compound logistics delays and freight costs, and represent a “systemic transfer of wealth.”
  • While the White House asserts foreign exporters will ultimately bear the tariff costs and companies are onshoring production, the S&P Global report indicates significant impacts on domestic prices and corporate profitability.

The Story So Far

  • President Trump’s tariff policies, including a 10% tariff on all goods entering the U.S. and “reciprocal” tariffs on various countries, were implemented to address what the White House describes as a “broken status quo” in trade. The administration’s goal is to restore a fair trade balance and encourage the onshoring of production, with the expectation that foreign exporters will ultimately bear the financial burden.

Why This Matters

  • President Trump’s tariffs are projected to cost global businesses over $1.2 trillion by 2025, with the majority of this financial burden, an estimated two-thirds, expected to be passed directly onto consumers, leading to higher prices for goods. This policy will also significantly impact corporate profit margins, forcing companies to adapt supply chains and presenting a critical consideration for Federal Reserve monetary policy as officials assess its inflationary and economic effects.

Who Thinks What?

  • S&P Global’s analysis projects President Trump’s tariffs will cost global businesses over $1.2 trillion by 2025, with two-thirds of this financial burden passed onto consumers, effectively acting as a systemic transfer of wealth.
  • The White House, through spokesman Kush Desai, contends that the cost of tariffs will ultimately be borne by foreign exporters, asserting that tariffs are prompting companies to shift and diversify supply chains, including onshoring production to the United States.
  • Federal Reserve officials generally view duties as a one-time hit to prices rather than a source of persistent inflationary pressures, a sentiment echoed by market analysts who expect an initial contraction in profit margins but anticipate a recovery as firms adapt through technology and reshaped global value chains.

President Donald Trump’s tariffs are projected to cost global businesses over $1.2 trillion in 2025, with the majority of this financial burden expected to be passed onto consumers, according to a new analysis from S&P Global. The firm’s conservative estimates indicate that companies will absorb only one-third of these costs, while the remaining two-thirds will fall on households.

Analysis Details

The estimate, detailed in a white paper released Thursday, is based on information provided by approximately 15,000 sell-side analysts across 9,000 companies that contribute to S&P’s proprietary research indexes. Daniel Sandberg, an author of the report, noted that “tariffs and trade barriers act as taxes on supply chains and divert cash to governments; logistics delays and freight costs compound the effect.” He described these forces as representing “a systemic transfer of wealth from corporate profits to workers, suppliers, governments, and infrastructure investors.”

The figures incorporate an estimated $907 billion impact on covered companies, with the remainder affecting uncovered firms, private equity, and venture capital. Sandberg, who co-wrote the report with senior quantitative analyst Drew Bowers, added that “with real output declining, consumers are paying more for less, suggesting that this two-thirds share represents a lower bound on their true burden.”

White House Response and Policy Context

White House spokesman Kush Desai stated that “while Americans may face a transition period from tariffs upending a broken status quo that has put America Last, the cost of tariffs will ultimately be borne by foreign exporters.” Desai also indicated that companies are already “shifting and diversifying their supply chains in response to tariffs, including by onshoring production to the United States.”

In April, President Trump implemented 10% tariffs on all goods entering the U.S. and established individual “reciprocal” tariffs for numerous other countries. Since then, the White House has engaged in negotiations and agreements, while also adding duties on specific items such as kitchen cabinets, autos, and timber. A key inflection point, according to the S&P paper, was Trump’s removal in May of the “de minimis” exception for goods under $800, which had previously allowed low-priced goods to bypass tariff barriers.

Economic and Monetary Implications

The magnitude of the tariff impact and the distribution of costs are critical considerations for the White House, which aims to present the duties as essential for restoring a fair trade balance. They are also significant for policymakers at the Federal Reserve, who are tasked with calibrating monetary policy. Fed officials have generally viewed duties as a one-time hit to prices rather than a source of persistent inflationary pressures.

S&P researchers found a similar sentiment among analysts, with a consensus expecting a 64 basis point contraction in profit margins this year, fading to 28 basis points for 2026 and then 8 to 10 basis points in 2027-28. The authors wrote that “2025 locked in the hit; 2026 and 2027 will test whether the market’s optimism about re-equilibration is warranted.” They noted that the market currently envisions a recovery of margins to pre-tariff trajectories, with the justification for this faith dependent on how firms adapt through technology, cost discipline, and reshaped global value chains.

Outlook

The S&P Global report underscores the substantial financial implications of President Trump’s tariff policies, forecasting a considerable cost to global businesses and consumers. While the White House maintains that foreign exporters will ultimately bear the burden, the analysis suggests a significant impact on domestic prices and corporate profitability, shaping both economic policy and corporate strategies in the coming years.

Add a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Secret Link