Ethereum Dominates Developer Scene: How Solana’s Surge Challenges the Status Quo

Ethereum leads in developer growth, adding 16,000 contributors, while Solana sees rapid expansion and data scrutiny.
Close-up of multiple physical-looking gold coins featuring the Ethereum logo and name, illuminated in a dramatic, dark setting. Close-up of multiple physical-looking gold coins featuring the Ethereum logo and name, illuminated in a dramatic, dark setting.
A stack of glowing, gold-colored coins displaying the Ethereum logo and name in a dark setting. By MDL.

Executive Summary

  • Ethereum continues to lead in blockchain development, attracting over 16,000 new contributors and maintaining the largest active developer base of 31,869, including Layer-2 networks.
  • Solana is the second-most popular for new developers, adding approximately 11,500, and shows rapid growth, but concerns exist regarding potential undercounting of its developer figures.
  • Developer tracking methodologies face scrutiny regarding EVM-compatible chains and “vibe coding,” while Latin American developers increasingly prefer building on established blockchains like Ethereum and Polygon over new base-layer protocols.
  • The Story So Far

  • Ethereum maintains its lead in attracting blockchain developers due to its robust network and expanding layer-2 solutions, while Solana is rapidly gaining ground, challenging the accuracy of current developer metrics. This dynamic is set against a backdrop where developers, particularly in regions like Latin America, increasingly prefer building on established, mature ecosystems such as Ethereum and Polygon for their transparency, ease of use, and perceived regulatory clarity, rather than developing new base-layer protocols.
  • Why This Matters

  • Ethereum’s continued dominance in attracting new and active developers, particularly with its robust Layer-2 solutions, solidifies its position as a central hub for blockchain innovation and long-term ecosystem viability. Meanwhile, Solana’s rapid developer growth, despite ongoing debates over data accuracy, highlights a competitive and evolving landscape where the focus is shifting towards building practical applications on established, mature chains rather than creating new base-layer protocols, especially in regions like Latin America, indicating a maturing industry with an emphasis on real-world problem-solving.
  • Who Thinks What?

  • Electric Capital’s data, cited by the Ethereum Foundation, indicates that Ethereum maintains its lead in attracting new and active developers, reinforcing its position as the most actively developed blockchain ecosystem with over 31,000 active developers.
  • The Solana Foundation, through Jacob Creech, suggests that Electric Capital’s methodology may significantly undercount Solana developers, arguing that around 7,800 developers might be missing from the current dataset.
  • Analysts, including Jarrod Watts, contend that broader developer tracking methodologies face scrutiny, potentially inflating overall developer figures with “vibe coding slop and hackathon repos” and arguing that EVM-compatible ecosystems should be grouped.
  • Ethereum continues to solidify its position as the leading blockchain ecosystem for developers, attracting over 16,000 new contributors between January and September 2025, according to data from Electric Capital cited by the Ethereum Foundation. This influx underscores Ethereum’s sustained dominance, driven by its robust network and expanding layer-2 solutions. Solana emerged as the second-most popular destination for new developers, adding approximately 11,500 during the same period, though its foundation suggests the actual number may be higher due to potential data undercounting.

    Developer Landscape Overview

    Electric Capital’s developer tracker indicates that Ethereum currently boasts the largest active developer base across all blockchain ecosystems, with 31,869 active developers. This figure includes contributions to prominent layer-2 networks such as Arbitrum, Optimism, and Unichain, as defined by L2Beat, ensuring no double-counting of developers working across multiple layers.

    Solana follows with 17,708 active developers, while Bitcoin trails with 11,036. Despite Ethereum’s larger overall base, Solana has demonstrated significantly stronger growth over the past two years, with its full-time developer count increasing by 29.1% year-on-year and a remarkable 61.7% surge over two years, marking one of the fastest expansions in the industry. In comparison, full-time Ethereum developers grew by 5.8% year-on-year.

    Data Methodology and Challenges

    The Solana Foundation has raised concerns regarding Electric Capital’s methodology, with Jacob Creech, head of developer relations, stating that around 7,800 developers might be missing from the current dataset. Creech urged the community to submit GitHub repositories to enhance Solana’s tracking accuracy.

    The broader developer tracking methodology has also faced scrutiny from analysts. Some argue that ecosystems utilizing the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM), such as Polygon and BNB Chain, should be grouped together due to shared tools and programming standards. Additionally, Jarrod Watts, head of Australia for layer-2 project Abstract, suggested that factors like AI-assisted code generation and hackathon projects could be inflating overall developer figures with “vibe coding slop and hackathon repos that are never touched again.”

    Latin America’s Developer Trends

    A report by Sherlock Communications highlights a growing trend among developers in Latin America to build on established blockchains like Ethereum and Polygon, rather than creating new base-layer protocols. Ethereum accounts for over 75% of regional blockchain transactions, while Polygon’s share has nearly doubled to 20%.

    Developers in the region cite transparency, ease of use, and regulatory clarity as primary motivations for choosing mature ecosystems. Luiz Eduardo Abreu Hadad, a Sherlock researcher, noted that Latin America’s developer community exhibits “strong technical maturity” and a focus on solving real-world problems. This trend is supported by on-chain data from 697,000 transactions across countries including Brazil, Mexico, Bolivia, and Peru, although local projects like Brazil’s Núclea Chain and RBB demonstrate the region’s potential for developing its own blockchain infrastructure.

    Key Takeaways

    Ethereum maintains its lead in attracting new and active developers, reinforcing its position as the most actively developed blockchain. Solana, however, is experiencing rapid growth, challenging the accuracy of current developer metrics. The broader discussion around data collection and the preference for established chains in regions like Latin America underscore the dynamic and maturing landscape of blockchain development.

    Add a comment

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Secret Link