A longstanding boundary dispute in Western Massachusetts has culminated in a legal battle, as a couple from Huntington took their neighbor to court after years of encroachments on their property. This case, heard this month at Hampshire County Superior Court, highlights a growing trend of individuals representing themselves in civil court due to rising legal costs.
The plaintiffs, David and Lori Baillargeon, claimed their neighbor continually disregarded property lines, resulting in the removal of trees and unauthorized use of their land. Attempts to resolve these issues amicably were unsuccessful, prompting the couple to file a lawsuit in 2021. Both parties appeared in court without legal representation, a situation known as pro se, which reflects a national increase in self-representation as noted by the National Center for State Courts.
During the trial, unexpected developments unfolded, including a delay from an expert witness that led David Baillargeon to call his wife to testify. This two-day trial concluded with a jury ruling in favor of the Baillargeons, awarding them $360,451 in damages. The couple expressed that while the verdict was welcome, the lawsuit might have been avoided if Massachusetts had more stringent property laws.
The Baillargeons, who have lived on their property since 1979, operate several businesses in Huntington, including an antiques enterprise. They initially hired legal counsel but resorted to representing themselves as expenses mounted. Their lawsuit detailed various allegations against their neighbor, Matthew Lennon, including property encroachment and harassment.
The conflict dates back to February 2018, when the Baillargeons encountered Lennon on their land. Initial interactions were confrontational, leading to a series of disputes about property boundaries and land use. Lennon, who purchased his home for $15,500, defended his actions in court, asserting his intent to live peacefully with his family in the wooded area.
The Baillargeons claimed that the property purchased by Lennon was intended as a “hunter’s camp” rather than a residence, and argued that his actions were part of an effort to illegitimately expand his property boundaries. Despite police involvement, enforcement of no trespass signs proved ineffective, leaving the couple to seek judicial intervention.
Huntington, a small town west of Northampton, is home to the Baillargeons’ expansive 86-acre forested property, which is accessible only by private dirt roads. After the jury’s verdict, they await a judge’s decision on an injunction to uphold their property rights. Meanwhile, Lennon retains the option to appeal the ruling.
The Baillargeons advocate for stronger trespass laws in Massachusetts, noting that the current penalties are insufficient to deter property violations. They highlighted Maine’s more severe penalties as a potential model for reform. As they contemplate semi-retirement and a relocation of their antiques business, the couple hopes for a resolution to their legal challenges.
