In recent developments surrounding Orlando’s Trust Act, Mayor Buddy Dyer confirmed that the policy is still in effect, undergoing legal examination by city attorneys. This policy, which prohibits city employees from inquiring about the immigration status of crime victims or witnesses, has recently come under scrutiny. Criticism has been voiced by Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier, who classified it as a “sanctuary policy” and issued warnings of potential repercussions for Dyer, including the possibility of his removal from office.
Mayor Dyer emphasized the ongoing review process to ensure compliance with state and federal laws. If any inconsistencies are found, the policy would be rendered ineffective. Established in 2018, the “Fair Treatment of All (Trust Act Policy)” was approved by the city council to enhance trust within immigrant communities, encouraging them to interact with law enforcement when necessary. Officials have consistently stated that the policy was not designed to defy federal law, and this intention was explicitly included from its inception.
The mayor acknowledged the absence of similar policies in other Florida cities but noted their presence in different parts of the United States. The recent controversy was sparked after it was discovered that the Orlando Police Department had signed an agreement with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) under a new state mandate, which advocates argue contradicts the Trust Act. This agreement implies a commitment to training a portion of the police force to support ICE operations.
Following the April 7 city council discussion, Uthmeier’s attention was drawn to this policy, prompting a public response. In a social media post, Uthmeier criticized the Trust Act for allegedly contravening state law, asserting that it restricted law enforcement’s ability to gather necessary immigration status information. The Florida ban on sanctuary policies, enacted in 2019, serves as the backdrop for this conflict.
Mayor Dyer responded to Uthmeier’s concerns with a letter reiterating Orlando’s commitment to adhering to state and federal regulations, although it did not specifically address the future of the Trust Act. Uthmeier acknowledged this response, expressing appreciation for the city’s assurance of compliance. Meanwhile, advocacy groups, such as Immigrants Are Welcome Here, continue to call for the cancellation of the 287(g) agreement with ICE, citing potential risks to local immigrants.
In a brief statement, Mayor Dyer indicated that should the Trust Act be deemed unlawful, it would not require further council action for abolition. The city remains firm in its dedication to following legal directives.
The Evolving Landscape
The ongoing scrutiny and legal review of Orlando’s Trust Act could have significant implications for the community. The policy, designed to build trust between immigrant communities and law enforcement, faces challenges that may affect its future viability. If overturned, there could be a chilling effect on how immigrants engage with police, potentially undermining public safety and community relations.
The broader discourse surrounding sanctuary policies reflects a nationwide conversation about immigration and law enforcement’s role. Orlando’s situation highlights the complexities cities face in balancing state mandates with local priorities. As the legal review unfolds, the community is poised to witness how these developments will influence local governance and social cohesion, especially among immigrant residents.
