A federal grand jury in Pittsburgh has indicted a Morgantown resident on charges of possessing an unregistered firearm. The indictment, announced by Acting U.S. Attorney Troy Rivetti, names 26-year-old Zachary Vincent Velling as the sole defendant.
The incident in question occurred on November 12, when Velling attempted to pass through security at the Pittsburgh International Airport. During routine screening, Transportation Security Administration officers identified a suspicious item in Velling’s carry-on luggage. Upon further inspection by Allegheny County Police, the item was revealed to be a MK24 MOD 0,6 Bang/Flash diversionary hand grenade. Under federal law, this type of grenade is classified as a firearm and destructive device, requiring registration in the National Firearms Registration and Transfer Record. Velling did not have the necessary registration.
Velling had previously faced charges of possession of an offensive weapon and criminal attempt in the Allegheny Court of Common Pleas. These charges were dismissed following the federal indictment. The legal framework allows for a potential maximum sentence of ten years in prison and a fine of up to $250,000. The actual sentence will depend on the severity of the offense and Velling’s prior criminal history, if any. Assistant U.S. Attorney Mark V. Gurzo is responsible for prosecuting the case.
The investigation was a collaborative effort involving the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, the Allegheny County Police Department, the Allegheny County District Attorney’s Office, and the Transportation Security Administration.
Community Impact
This incident underscores the importance of stringent security measures at airports to ensure the safety of the traveling public. Possession of unregistered firearms and explosive devices presents significant risks, heightening the necessity for vigilant enforcement of security protocols. Such incidents remind the community and travelers of the serious legal consequences associated with attempting to transport illegal items through airport security.
For the local community, the case highlights the ongoing efforts of law enforcement agencies to prevent potential threats and maintain public safety. It also serves as a reminder of the collaborative work between federal and local authorities to uphold security standards and protect citizens. As the legal process unfolds, the case will likely prompt discussions about security practices and the importance of compliance with federal regulations regarding firearms and explosive devices.