Following the inauguration of President Donald Trump, students began expressing concerns regarding potential changes in immigration policies. One student questioned the ability to adopt siblings in case their parents were deported, while another inquired about the feasibility of attending school virtually to avoid immigration agents. A straight-A student from South America expressed fears about being sent back to her home country. Additionally, students circulated “Know Your Rights” flyers, advising individuals on how to respond if questioned about their immigration status.
President Trump’s campaign promise to deport millions of undocumented immigrants has generated speculation and fear about the impact on children of targeted immigrants. The administration’s actions in early March included detaining families in Texas detention centers with plans to deport adults and children together.
In response, school districts in the Kansas City area have been proactive, training staff on protocols for potential encounters with immigration agents and issuing communications to parents. However, not all districts or schools have publicly addressed these issues, leading to mixed reactions from parents.
Immigrant children have constitutionally protected rights to attend public schools from kindergarten through 12th grade, as recognized in the 1982 U.S. Supreme Court decision, Plyler v. Doe. This ruling prohibits schools from inquiring about students’ immigration status during enrollment. The Shawnee Mission School District reinforces these principles by emphasizing that every child deserves access to quality education, irrespective of immigration status.
Previously, schools were considered “sensitive locations” by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and were generally off-limits for enforcement actions. However, this policy was rescinded by President Trump through an executive order. In response, the Denver Public Schools filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, asserting that the policy change hindered educational responsibilities. Nonetheless, a federal judge sided with Homeland Security, although anxious sentiments remain among students and parents.
Concerns persist among immigrant families in the Kansas City area, with some parents feeling that district support is insufficient. Plyler v. Doe remains a vital legal protection, but challenges to this precedent, such as recent legislative efforts in Tennessee, continue to generate apprehension.
Educators report that fear of immigration actions affects students’ ability to focus on learning. Advocacy groups emphasize that misinformation spreads rapidly, particularly through social media, exacerbating concerns about raids on schools. While no ICE actions have been reported on local school grounds, an incident involving the arrest of a man near a Kansas City school heightened community fears.
School districts are carefully managing communication with parents, reiterating that law enforcement access to student records is limited. Kansas City Public Schools continue to prioritize the emotional well-being of students, providing online guidance and training staff to recognize valid legal documents.
In navigating these uncertainties, districts aim to reassure families while maintaining a balanced approach to communication. Kansas City Public Schools Superintendent Jennifer Collier has affirmed the district’s commitment to supporting students during these challenging times.