Mavis Discount Tire Files Opposition to Amendments in Schoharie Crash Civil Lawsuits

Mavis attorneys argue new claims in the Schoharie limo crash wrongful death suits are belated and lack merit.
Court legal graphic for Schoharie crash civil lawsuits. Court legal graphic for Schoharie crash civil lawsuits.
By MDL.

Executive Summary

  • Mavis attorneys filed a motion to block revisions to wrongful death suits by the estates of Michael Ukaj and Scott Lisinicchia.
  • The defense argues the proposed new claims are belated and lack merit.
  • Mavis was previously found negligent regarding the inspection of the limousine involved in the 2018 crash.
  • These lawsuits are the final two remaining cases seeking settlement for the tragedy that killed 20 people.

Lawyers representing Mavis Discount Tire have filed a motion to block proposed amendments to wrongful death lawsuits filed by the estates of two victims of the 2018 Schoharie limousine crash. The legal opposition comes as the litigation regarding the tragedy, which claimed 20 lives, approaches its final stages.

The filings specifically address lawsuits brought by the estates of Marine Michael Ukaj and limousine driver Scott Lisinicchia. According to reports from the Times Union and WNYT, attorneys for Mavis argue that the plaintiffs are attempting to introduce new claims that are “belated and without merit.” The defense contends that these revisions should not be permitted at this stage of the legal process.

Background information regarding the case indicates that Mavis Discount Tire was previously found negligent in connection with the inspection of the limousine involved in the crash. These two lawsuits represent the final victims seeking settlements related to the incident. In separate criminal proceedings, the limousine company operator, Nauman Hussain, was found guilty of manslaughter in May 2023.

Civil Litigation Outlook

This filing highlights the procedural complexities often seen in the late stages of high-profile civil litigation. As the final cases move toward potential resolution, defense strategies typically focus on limiting the scope of liability by challenging the introduction of new legal theories or claims after significant discovery has occurred. The court’s ruling on this motion will essentially define the parameters for the remaining settlement negotiations or any prospective trial proceedings regarding the final two claims.

Add a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Secret Link