Supreme Court Halts FTC Commissioner’s Reinstatement: What This Means for President Trump’s Power

Trump can keep FTC commissioner off payroll temporarily. Court reviews his bid to fire Slaughter.
An elevated photograph of the historic, neoclassical Apex Building, the headquarters of the Federal Trade Commission in Washington, D.C., viewed at dusk from across a wide avenue. An elevated photograph of the historic, neoclassical Apex Building, the headquarters of the Federal Trade Commission in Washington, D.C., viewed at dusk from across a wide avenue.
The Apex Building, headquarters of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), is a landmark of neoclassical architecture in Washington, D.C., seen here at dusk. By Harrison Keely - Own work, CC BY 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons.

Executive Summary

  • The Supreme Court granted President Trump a temporary reprieve, allowing him to keep FTC Commissioner Rebecca Kelly Slaughter off the payroll while it reviews his emergency request to remove her.
  • Chief Justice Roberts issued an administrative stay, meaning Slaughter will remain out of work until the high court resolves Trump’s emergency appeal, overturning a previous appeals court decision.
  • The case touches on the broader legal debate surrounding a president’s power to dismiss officials from independent agencies, which typically require “cause” under federal law.
  • The Story So Far

  • The current legal dispute stems from President Trump’s attempt to fire Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Commissioner Rebecca Kelly Slaughter, which is part of a larger ongoing debate about the extent of a president’s power to dismiss officials from independent agencies. While federal law typically requires “cause” for such dismissals, the Supreme Court has historically shown skepticism toward these limitations, often affirming a president’s general power to fire employees at will, making this case a key test of presidential authority.
  • Why This Matters

  • The Supreme Court’s temporary stay, a procedural victory for President Trump, immediately keeps an FTC commissioner off the payroll while the justices review his emergency appeal. More significantly, this decision sets the stage for the Court to clarify the constitutional limits of presidential power to dismiss officials from independent agencies, which could have lasting implications for the autonomy and functioning of federal regulatory bodies.
  • Who Thinks What?

  • President Donald Trump seeks to remove Rebecca Kelly Slaughter from the Federal Trade Commission, viewing the Supreme Court’s administrative stay as a procedural victory in his effort to assert presidential firing powers over independent agency officials.
  • Rebecca Kelly Slaughter, who was ordered reinstated by lower courts, respects the Supreme Court’s temporary decision but intends to see the legal challenge to her firing through to the end.
  • The Supreme Court on Monday granted a temporary reprieve to President Donald Trump, allowing him to keep a Federal Trade Commission (FTC) commissioner off the payroll while the justices review his emergency request to remove her. Chief Justice John Roberts issued an administrative stay, providing the court more time to consider Trump’s bid to fire Rebecca Kelly Slaughter.

    This short-term order, known as an administrative stay, does not indicate how the Supreme Court will ultimately rule on President Trump’s appeal. Chief Justice Roberts, who handles emergency appeals from the federal court of appeals in Washington, has ordered Slaughter’s legal team to respond to Trump’s emergency appeal by September 15.

    The order means that Slaughter will remain out of work until the high court resolves the emergency case. Previously, a divided federal appeals court had ordered Slaughter to be reinstated while the litigation over her firing proceeded, prompting the administration to file an emergency appeal with the Supreme Court.

    President Trump initially fired Slaughter and another Democratic FTC commissioner in March. The Federal Trade Commission is responsible for enforcing anti-trust and consumer protection laws across the United States. Slaughter told CNN that she respects the court’s decision and intends to “see this case through to the end.”

    Slaughter was first appointed to the FTC board by President Trump in 2018. She was later nominated for a second term by President Joe Biden and confirmed by the Senate without opposition last year. A federal district court had ordered her reinstatement in July, a decision that a Washington, D.C., appeals court subsequently upheld.

    Context of Presidential Firing Powers

    This case touches on the broader legal debate surrounding a president’s power to dismiss officials from independent agencies. Federal law typically limits the circumstances under which a president may fire leadership at many independent agencies, often requiring a demonstration of “cause.”

    However, the Supreme Court has historically shown skepticism toward these limitations in other contexts, asserting that the president generally holds the power to fire employees at will. While the Supreme Court has allowed President Trump to keep board members off the payroll in other instances, it has historically maintained a line of protection around the Federal Reserve.

    In a related development, President Trump has recently initiated a new line of attack concerning the Federal Reserve, arguing he has cause to fire Fed Governor Lisa Cook over allegations of mortgage fraud.

    The Supreme Court’s temporary order represents a procedural victory for President Trump in his effort to remove Rebecca Kelly Slaughter from the Federal Trade Commission. The case will continue as the justices review the emergency appeal, with a final decision expected to further clarify the extent of presidential authority over independent agency appointments.

    Add a comment

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Secret Link