Trump Revokes Kamala Harris’s Secret Service Protection: What This Means for Her Safety

Trump revoked Kamala Harris’s Secret Service protection, effective 2025. This move drew outrage from California officials.
A Secret Service agent in a suit and sunglasses walks in Washington, D.C., with a police officer in the blurred background. A Secret Service agent in a suit and sunglasses walks in Washington, D.C., with a police officer in the blurred background.
A Secret Service agent walks near the White House, with a police officer visible in the background, a common scene in Washington, D.C. By Miami Daily Life / MiamiDaily.Life.

Executive Summary

  • President Donald Trump has ordered the revocation of Kamala Harris’s Secret Service protection, effective September 1, 2025.
  • The directive discontinues security procedures beyond legal requirements, reportedly without a new security review, despite an earlier extension of her protection by President Biden.
  • The decision means Harris will lose critical threat intelligence analysis and residence protection, drawing strong criticism from California officials who view it as politically motivated.
  • The Story So Far

  • President Donald Trump’s directive to revoke Kamala Harris’s Secret Service protection, effective September 1, 2025, comes despite an earlier extension of her protection by President Joe Biden beyond the standard six months for former vice presidents. This decision, which reportedly did not stem from a security review or new threat assessment, is being characterized by political figures as an act of “revenge” and “vindictive political impulses,” suggesting a politically motivated move rather than one based on security concerns.
  • Why This Matters

  • The directive by President Trump to discontinue Kamala Harris’s Secret Service protection, effective September 1, 2025, without an apparent security review, significantly impacts her personal safety by removing access to critical threat intelligence and federal protection, potentially forcing substantial private security costs. This decision, widely criticized as politically motivated, also establishes a concerning precedent regarding the politicization of security provisions for former high-ranking officials, raising questions about the future independence of such protections.
  • Who Thinks What?

  • President Donald Trump issued a directive to revoke Secret Service protection for Kamala Harris, effective September 1, 2025, discontinuing security procedures beyond those legally required and reportedly not stemming from a security review.
  • Aides to Kamala Harris expressed concern over the loss of constant threat intelligence analysis and protection for her residence, noting she will lose access to threat warnings and face potential millions in private protection costs.
  • California Governor Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass expressed outrage, characterizing the decision as “erratic, vindictive political impulses” and “another act of revenge following a long list of political retaliation.”
  • President Donald Trump has issued a directive to revoke the Secret Service protection for Kamala Harris, effective September 1, 2025, according to a letter reviewed by CNN. The order, issued from the White House on Thursday, discontinues security procedures beyond those legally required, and reportedly did not stem from a security review or new threat assessment.

    While former vice presidents typically receive six months of Secret Service protection after leaving office, Harris’s protection had been extended for an additional year through a directive signed by then-President Joe Biden. The cancellation of her detail occurs as Harris is promoting her memoir, “107 Days,” on a book tour.

    The discontinuation means Harris will lose access to constant threat intelligence analysis, which covers in-person situations, emails, texts, and social media. Her residence will also no longer be protected by federal agents, with aides expressing concern over the loss of threat warnings.

    The potential cost of private protection could amount to millions of dollars annually. This decision follows the earlier removal of personal security for Harris’s husband, Doug Emhoff, on July 21.

    California Governor Gavin Newsom expressed outrage regarding the decision, stating that the safety of public officials should not be subject to “erratic, vindictive political impulses.” Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass echoed this sentiment, calling it “another act of revenge following a long list of political retaliation” after consulting with Newsom.

    Harris could also potentially receive protection from the Los Angeles city police department. A spokesperson for President Biden declined to comment on the earlier extension of Harris’s protection.

    The directive from President Trump to discontinue Kamala Harris’s Secret Service detail, effective next year, has sparked significant political reactions and raises questions about the future of security for former high-ranking officials. The move comes despite an earlier extension of her protection and without an apparent security review.

    Add a comment

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Secret Link