The European Union appears poised to increase its imports of U.S. oil and gas as President Donald Trump continues to urge the bloc to purchase more American energy. However, the EU’s commitment to its climate and environmental goals remains a significant factor in determining the scale of such imports. Energy Commissioner Dan Jørgensen has indicated that while there is potential for increased imports, it must align with European environmental regulations.
Trump recently highlighted the U.S.’s trade deficit with the EU, stating that one way to reduce the $350 billion gap is through increased energy sales. The U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis reported a $235.6 billion deficit in 2024, which, though substantial, may not match the potential European market for American liquefied natural gas (LNG).
In 2024, the total value of Europe’s energy imports was €375.9 billion, including pipeline gas, petroleum, coal, and LNG. Of this, LNG accounted for €41.4 billion, with the U.S. holding just under half of the market share. However, overall import volumes decreased by 15% compared to the previous year.
As Europe continues its push for renewable energy, particularly wind and solar, the demand for fossil fuels is declining. The EU’s goal to end all Russian energy imports by 2027 may create a short-term opportunity to increase American LNG imports, given Russia’s current 17.5% market share.
Nevertheless, EU officials have expressed caution about significantly increasing imports from a single supplier. A Commission spokesperson emphasized the importance of avoiding over-dependence, reflecting lessons learned from past experiences. The European Commission’s role is limited to reviewing permitting procedures for LNG infrastructure and exploring demand pooling options, rather than acting as a market participant.
Energy Commissioner Jørgensen, in an interview, reiterated the potential for increased LNG imports but stressed the necessity of adhering to European environmental standards. The Methane Regulation, which requires monitoring, reporting, and verification obligations on exporters to the EU, aligns with these standards. It also restricts contracts for fuels with a high upstream carbon footprint, such as gas extracted through fracking, prevalent in U.S. production.
While the EU remains in dialogue with U.S. counterparts regarding the methane regulation, the broader context includes the EU’s commitment to an exit plan from Russian energy, initially promised by March’s end. However, the EU executive’s agenda indicates no intention to present this plan before the summer, leaving limited time for implementation.
Your World Now
The potential increase in U.S. oil and gas exports to the EU could have several implications for both regions. For the EU, a greater reliance on American energy might offer short-term relief from Russian imports but could conflict with long-term environmental goals. This shift necessitates balancing energy security with sustainability commitments, influencing policy decisions and infrastructure investments.
For the U.S., expanding energy exports to Europe could bolster the domestic energy sector, potentially leading to increased production and job creation. However, this expansion must consider environmental regulations and market dynamics, as Europe remains committed to reducing fossil fuel dependency. The evolving energy landscape will require strategic planning and collaboration between the U.S. and EU to address mutual goals and challenges.
