A New Jersey township council’s recent ordinance to prohibit ‘props’ during public meetings—potentially including the U.S. flag and Constitution—has triggered both public outcry and a free speech group’s warning.
The Edison Township council recently enacted regulations intended to enhance decorum in often boisterous public meetings. These new regulations include a ban on props, costumes, non-medical masks, offensive language, and disruptive conduct. Additionally, individual comments are limited to four minutes, and rebuttal testimony is prohibited.
Maryann Hennessey, a local resident, expressed her opposition during the council meeting, stating, ‘To consider the American flag and the Constitution a prop when someone raises it is an insult to what the flag is, what the flag stands for, and what this country is.’ This sentiment reflects the broader concern among attendees that the ordinance might infringe on symbolic expressions of patriotism.
Council President Nishith Patel defended the measures, asserting they aim to sustain order and foster respectful dialogue, rather than suppress free speech. He noted past instances where theatrical gestures and showmanship detracted from substantive community issues, prompting the council to act.
The ordinance’s reference to the American flag and Constitution as potential ‘props’ used ‘performatively’ has raised eyebrows. Patel insisted their power lies in the core values they represent—freedom, equality, and justice—rather than their physical representation during speeches.
A heated exchange occurred during the meeting, where a resident defied the ordinance by waving an American flag. After repeated warnings, he was escorted out, further escalating tensions.
The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), a free speech advocacy group, reacted by sharing footage of the incident on social media, labeling it as ‘unacceptable’ and cautioning the council about potential legal repercussions. FIRE’s warning underscores the growing scrutiny the council faces regarding potential First Amendment violations.
Some council members themselves voiced unease with the ordinance. Notably, two members voted against it, with one member even brandishing a flag during the vote, symbolizing their disapproval.
The new regulations set by the Edison Township council have ignited a heated debate over free speech and the symbolic use of national emblems in public discourse. As community members and advocacy groups prepare to challenge the ordinance, the council finds itself in the midst of a broader conversation on maintaining decorum while respecting constitutional rights.
Source: Apnews
