Tom Homan speaks at a press conference with a microphone in front of him Tom Homan speaks at a press conference with a microphone in front of him
Former Acting ICE Director Tom Homan, referred to as "Border Czar," speaks to reporters outside the West Wing. By Joey Sussman / Shutterstock.com.

Did Trump’s Border Czar Take a Bribe? DOJ Shuts Down Probe Amidst Political Firestorm

DOJ closed Tom Homan probe after accepting $50k. Officials cited no wrongdoing; critics called it political.

Executive Summary

  • A Justice Department investigation into Tom Homan, President Trump’s border czar, was closed after he was recorded by undercover FBI agents accepting $50,000 cash in September 2024.
  • The probe began over allegations Homan agreed to help agents, posing as businessmen, secure government contracts in a potential second Trump administration.
  • The Justice Department closed the case due to doubts about proving a specific act in exchange for the cash and because Homan was not holding a government position at the time of the alleged incident, with officials stating “no credible evidence of any criminal wrongdoing.”
  • The Story So Far

  • The Justice Department’s closure of an investigation into Tom Homan, President Trump’s border czar, stemmed from an undercover FBI sting operation in September 2024 where Homan was recorded accepting $50,000 cash, allegedly to assist in securing government contracts in a potential second Trump administration. The case, which originated under the Biden administration, was closed after President Trump began his second term, with officials citing doubts about proving a specific criminal act and Homan’s non-government status at the time, while the White House criticized the initial probe as politically motivated.
  • Why This Matters

  • The Justice Department’s decision to close its investigation into Tom Homan, President Trump’s border czar, despite recordings of him accepting $50,000 cash from undercover agents, underscores the high bar for proving a specific quid pro quo in alleged influence-peddling cases, particularly when the individual is not in an official government role. This outcome, which the White House characterized as a “blatantly political” investigation targeting Trump’s allies, risks further politicizing public perceptions of the Justice Department’s impartiality and could embolden individuals in similar positions to accept payments for perceived influence if direct criminal intent is difficult to establish.
  • Who Thinks What?

  • The Justice Department and FBI leadership, including FBI Director Kash Patel and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, closed the investigation into Tom Homan, stating they found no credible evidence of criminal wrongdoing and had doubts about proving a specific act in exchange for cash, noting Homan was not holding a government position at the time.
  • White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson characterized the investigation as “blatantly political,” defending Homan as a public servant and criticizing the Biden Department of Justice for allegedly targeting President Trump’s allies instead of focusing on “real criminals” and border security.
  • Reports from The New York Times and CNN indicated that Tom Homan was recorded by undercover FBI agents accepting $50,000 in cash in September 2024 and appeared to agree to assist them in securing government contracts should Donald Trump win reelection.
  • A Justice Department investigation into Tom Homan, who now serves as President Trump’s border czar, was closed after he was recorded last year by undercover FBI agents accepting $50,000 in cash, The New York Times reported Saturday. The payment, which the report indicates occurred in September 2024, arose from a probe that began investigating Homan for potential bribery and other crimes after he allegedly agreed to help the agents, posing as businessmen, secure government contracts in a potential second Trump administration.

    Investigation Details

    The probe initially did not target Homan, but rather began investigating him after the original subject of the case suggested that a payment to Homan could facilitate federal border security contracts, according to The Times. Undercover agents recorded Homan in September 2024, with the cash reportedly delivered in a bag from the fast-casual chain Cava.

    On the recording of the meeting, Homan appeared to agree to assist the undercover agents in securing contracts should Donald Trump win reelection. A person familiar with the matter also confirmed to CNN that Homan accepted a cash payment during the sting operation.

    DOJ’s Decision to Close the Case

    The Justice Department closed the investigation after President Trump began his second term this year. Prosecutors reportedly harbored doubts about their ability to prove Homan, who served as acting director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement in Trump’s first term, had agreed to a specific act in exchange for the cash.

    Another factor in closing the case was that Homan was not holding a government position at the time of the alleged incident. FBI Director Kash Patel and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche stated that the matter, which originated under the Biden administration, underwent a full review by FBI and DOJ officials.

    Official Statements

    Patel and Blanche issued a joint statement Saturday asserting that officials “found no credible evidence of any criminal wrongdoing.” They added, “The Department’s resources must remain focused on real threats to the American people, not baseless investigations.”

    White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson characterized the investigation as “blatantly political.” She defended Homan as “a career law enforcement officer and lifelong public servant,” while also criticizing the Biden Department of Justice.

    Jackson further stated that the probe, which found no evidence of illegal activity, exemplified how the Biden DOJ allegedly targeted President Trump’s allies. She contrasted this with investigating “real criminals and the millions of illegal aliens who flooded our country.”

    Key Takeaways

    The closure of the probe into Tom Homan highlights differing perspectives on the Justice Department’s investigative priorities and the conduct of political allies. While officials cited a lack of criminal wrongdoing and Homan’s non-government status at the time, critics frame the initial investigation as politically motivated.

    Add a comment

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Advertisement
    Secret Link