Kamala Harris smiles confidently in a portrait, wearing a brown suit jacket Kamala Harris smiles confidently in a portrait, wearing a brown suit jacket
Kamala Harris smiles confidently, wearing a brown suit jacket, in this portrait taken on September 25th. By FotoField / Shutterstock.com.

Harris Blasts Trump’s Comey Indictment: How Political Vendettas Threaten Justice

Harris slams Trump for Comey’s indictment, seeing it as revenge and a fulfillment of campaign threats.

Executive Summary

  • Kamala Harris expressed outrage and deep frustration over the indictment of James Comey, describing it as “painful to see” and questioning the Department of Justice’s involvement.
  • Harris believes the Comey indictment fulfills President Trump’s campaign promise to target political adversaries, a warning she had issued during her own campaign.
  • The Justice Department’s decision to charge Comey followed public pressure from Trump, including demands made to Attorney General Pam Bondi and the replacement of a U.S. attorney, raising concerns about the independence of the justice system.
  • The Story So Far

  • The recent indictment of James Comey is viewed by Kamala Harris as a direct fulfillment of Donald Trump’s stated intention during his campaign to pursue political adversaries. This action follows public pressure from Trump on the Justice Department, including specific demands to Attorney General Pam Bondi and the replacement of a U.S. attorney, against Comey, who has long been a frequent target of Trump’s criticism.
  • Why This Matters

  • The indictment of James Comey, which Vice President Kamala Harris views as President Trump fulfilling a campaign promise to target political adversaries, raises significant concerns about the independence of the Justice Department. Her comments suggest that Donald Trump’s public pressure on officials like Attorney General Pam Bondi and the replacement of a U.S. attorney may have influenced the charges, indicating a potential leveraging of the legal system for political vendettas.
  • Who Thinks What?

  • Kamala Harris views the indictment of James Comey as a politically motivated act by President Trump, fulfilling his campaign promise to target adversaries and leveraging the Justice Department for personal vendettas, which she finds frustrating and painful.
  • President Donald Trump is seen as pressuring the Justice Department to prosecute Comey, a frequent target of his criticism, to pursue vengeance against a political enemy, an action he had previously indicated during his campaign.
  • Kamala Harris expressed outrage and deep frustration over the recent indictment of former FBI Director James Comey, telling CNN that the charges represent President Donald Trump’s fulfillment of a campaign promise to target political adversaries. Harris’s comments come after the Justice Department brought charges against Comey, following public pressure from Trump on Attorney General Pam Bondi and the replacement of a U.S. attorney for the district where Comey was indicted.

    Harris’s Reaction to Indictment

    Speaking exclusively to CNN, Harris described the situation as “frustrating, but more than that, it’s painful to see.” She added, “I mean what’s happening with Comey: Are you fucking kidding me? The United States Department of Justice?” The Vice President has consistently woven critiques of President Trump’s potential second term into her reflections on last year’s campaign.

    Harris recalled warning during her campaign that Trump would pursue individuals he considered political enemies. “He said it; we knew he would do it,” Harris stated, emphasizing the relentless nature of these actions. The indictment of Comey, a frequent target of Trump’s criticism, appears to confirm these concerns for Harris.

    Allegations of Presidential Pressure

    The Justice Department’s decision to bring charges against Comey followed a period of public pressure from Trump. This included demands made to Attorney General Pam Bondi and the subsequent replacement of the U.S. attorney in the relevant district. Harris specifically noted a Truth Social post from last week, addressed to “Pam,” which she understood as a direct demand for prosecution.

    Regardless of whether the post was a direct message to Bondi, Harris told CNN that Trump’s intent seemed clear: to order the prosecution of someone against whom he has long sought vengeance. When asked if she viewed the indictment as a “crossing of a Rubicon,” or an irreversible boundary, Harris responded, “I don’t know. Define Rubicon.”

    Implications for the Justice System

    Harris’s strong reaction underscores a broader concern among some political figures regarding the independence of the Justice Department. Her comments highlight a perception that President Trump is leveraging the legal system to pursue personal and political vendettas, a practice she believes he had openly forewarned during his campaign.

    Add a comment

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Secret Link