Trump’s Supreme Court Bid: Will Justices Restrict Gender Markers on US Passports?

Trump asks SCOTUS to restrict passport sex markers for transgender people, reversing Biden’s policy.
US Passport US Passport
US Passport

Executive Summary

  • The Trump administration has formally requested the Supreme Court to permit restrictions on passport sex markers for transgender and nonbinary individuals, seeking to reverse Biden administration changes that allowed an “X” gender marker.
  • Trump’s policy, asserting only two unchangeable sexes and suspending “X” marker processing, was subsequently blocked by a nationwide injunction issued by a federal judge in Massachusetts.
  • The Trump administration argues to the Supreme Court that lower courts erred in their review and that its challenged policy does not discriminate based on sex, citing a prior Supreme Court decision.
  • The Story So Far

  • The current request to the Supreme Court by the Trump administration to restrict passport sex markers for transgender and nonbinary individuals directly seeks to reverse changes made during the Biden administration that allowed an “X” gender marker on U.S. passports. This action follows President Trump’s executive order asserting that only two sexes exist and are unchangeable, and comes after a federal judge issued a nationwide injunction blocking the restrictive policy, prompting the administration to appeal to the nation’s highest court.
  • Why This Matters

  • The Trump administration’s request to the Supreme Court to restrict passport gender markers to only male or female, reversing a Biden-era policy that allowed an “X” option, signifies a major legal and political challenge to LGBTQ+ rights. If granted, this move would significantly impact transgender and nonbinary Americans’ ability to obtain official documents that accurately reflect their gender identity, further intensifying the ongoing contention surrounding these policies in the United States.
  • Who Thinks What?

  • The Trump administration is seeking to restrict passport sex markers to two options, arguing that lower courts erred by scrutinizing the policy under a heightened level of judicial review and that the policy does not discriminate based on sex.
  • A federal judge in Massachusetts issued a nationwide injunction, blocking the Trump administration’s restrictive policy and effectively supporting the availability of the “X” gender marker.
  • The Biden administration had previously allowed individuals to select “X” as their gender marker on U.S. passports, a policy that the Trump administration is now attempting to reverse.
  • The Trump administration has formally requested the Supreme Court to permit it to restrict passport sex markers for transgender and nonbinary individuals, marking the latest attempt to involve the justices in disputes over policies targeting LGBTQ+ Americans. This move seeks to reverse changes made during the Biden administration that allowed individuals to select “X” as their gender marker on U.S. passports.

    Policy Reversal and Legal Challenges

    President Trump had previously issued an executive order asserting that only two sexes exist and are unchangeable. Following this, the State Department suspended the processing of passport applications seeking the “X” gender marker, effectively reversing accommodations for non-binary, intersex, and gender non-conforming persons that had been in place since April 2022.

    This policy change quickly led to legal challenges. A federal judge in Massachusetts subsequently issued a nationwide injunction, blocking the government from enforcing the restrictive policy. The legal battle has since escalated, with the Trump administration now appealing to the nation’s highest court.

    Arguments Before the Supreme Court

    In its filing, the solicitor general argued that lower courts made errors by scrutinizing the policy under a heightened level of judicial review. The administration contends that the rulings blocking the policy are inconsistent with a prior Supreme Court decision, which bolstered conservative state lawmakers’ efforts to enact and maintain laws affecting transgender Americans.

    The solicitor general further asserted that the Supreme Court’s precedent “makes clear that the challenged policy does not discriminate based on sex.” This argument forms a central part of the administration’s case to reinstate its policy limiting gender marker choices on passports.

    Ongoing Legal Battle

    The Supreme Court’s decision on whether to take up the case will have significant implications for the rights of transgender and nonbinary Americans seeking to accurately reflect their gender identity on official documents. The request underscores the ongoing legal and political contention surrounding LGBTQ+ policies in the United States.

    Add a comment

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Secret Link