Latvian President Edgars Rinkēvičs in Brussels, Belgium Latvian President Edgars Rinkēvičs in Brussels, Belgium
Latvian President Edgars Rinkēvičs, wearing a suit and tie, is pictured in Brussels, Belgium. By Alexandros Michailidis / Shutterstock.com.

Latvian President Challenges Hungary, Slovakia: Can They Heed Trump’s Call to Ditch Russian Energy?

Latvian President urges Hungary/Slovakia to stop Russian energy imports, impacting the Ukraine war.

Executive Summary

  • Latvian President Edgars Rinkēvičs urged Hungary and Slovakia to end Russian energy imports, aligning with President Donald Trump’s call, and emphasized that political will can achieve energy independence, citing Latvia’s own successful transition.
  • Rinkēvičs called for a decision on utilizing €210 billion in frozen Russian assets to support Ukraine and advocated for the EU to impose secondary sanctions against countries helping Russia circumvent existing measures.
  • The Latvian President noted the EU is not yet ready to make final decisions on providing “real security guarantees” for Ukraine, stressing the necessity of US support, including logistical assistance and intelligence, for any such initiatives.
  • The Story So Far

  • The ongoing war in Ukraine has significantly driven the European Union’s efforts to reduce its reliance on Russian energy and implement sanctions to economically pressure Russia. While the EU has made substantial progress in cutting oil and gas imports since February 2022, certain member states, notably Hungary and Slovakia, continue to resist a complete phase-out, prompting leaders like Latvia’s President Rinkēvičs to urge them to follow calls, including past criticisms from President Donald Trump, to fully divest from Russian energy to further impact Russia’s war efforts.
  • Why This Matters

  • The ongoing push for a complete phase-out of Russian energy imports, particularly targeting holdout EU members, reflects a strategic effort to weaken Russia’s war economy by leveraging political will and economic sanctions. This is compounded by calls to utilize €210 billion in frozen Russian assets for Ukraine’s defense and reconstruction, alongside imposing secondary sanctions on countries aiding Russia in circumventing existing measures, indicating an intensified financial pressure campaign. However, the EU’s ability to provide concrete, long-term security guarantees for Ukraine, including potential troop deployment, remains uncertain and heavily reliant on crucial logistical and intelligence support from the United States, highlighting the complexities and international dependencies in securing Ukraine’s future.
  • Who Thinks What?

  • Latvian President Edgars Rinkēvičs urges Hungary and Slovakia to end imports of Russian gas and oil, stating it’s a matter of “political will” that would impact the war in Ukraine, and also calls for utilizing frozen Russian assets and imposing secondary sanctions.
  • President Donald Trump previously criticized the European Union for continuing to purchase Russian energy, asserting that doing so funds the war against themselves.
  • Hungary and Slovakia firmly oppose a complete phase-out of Russian oil and gas, despite significant reductions in reliance by other EU members.
  • Latvian President Edgars Rinkēvičs has urged Hungary and Slovakia to heed President Donald Trump’s call for European nations to cease importing Russian gas and oil. Rinkēvičs stated that ending reliance on Russian energy is a matter of “political will,” linking an accelerated phase-out to impacting Russia’s war in Ukraine.

    Rinkēvičs cited Latvia’s own journey from 100% dependency on Russian energy in 2017 to complete independence in 2025, diversifying its suppliers. He emphasized that this transition demonstrates that political will leads to tangible results.

    The European Union has significantly reduced its reliance on Russian oil and gas since February 2022, cutting crude oil imports from approximately 27% to 3% and natural gas from roughly 45% to 18-19%. However, Slovakia and Hungary continue to firmly oppose a complete phase-out.

    During his address at the UN General Assembly, President Donald Trump previously criticized the European Union for continuing to purchase Russian energy. He questioned the logic, stating, “They’re funding the war against themselves.”

    Rinkēvičs believes that accelerating the phase-out of Russian oil and gas could significantly influence the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. He argued that increased sanctions and reduced energy purchases would further strain Russia’s economy.

    Sanctions and Frozen Assets

    The Latvian President also called for a decision on how to utilize €210 billion in frozen Russian assets to support Ukraine, particularly for weapons. The EU is currently exploring options for these funds to aid Ukraine’s defense and post-war reconstruction.

    Furthermore, Rinkēvičs urged the EU to impose “secondary sanctions against countries that are helping Russia circumvent” existing measures. He noted that some third countries are enabling the evasion of EU sanctions against Russia.

    Ukraine’s Security Guarantees

    Regarding Ukraine’s long-term security, Rinkēvičs indicated that the EU is “still not at the stage of making final decisions about providing real security guarantees.” A “coalition of the willing,” led by France and the UK, is working to develop a common approach for post-war security, potentially including troop deployment.

    He stressed the necessity of US support if the EU decides to provide security guarantees or send troops on the ground. This support, he clarified, would involve logistical assistance, intelligence, and other forms, rather than necessarily US troops on the ground.

    Rinkēvičs also commented on the political process, stating that much depends on the evolution of relations between Russia and Ukraine. He expressed skepticism, saying he doesn’t “see any willingness on the part of Russian Federation to enter into the serious peace talks.”

    Outlook on EU Energy and Security

    President Rinkēvičs’s remarks underscore a dual focus within the EU: accelerating energy independence from Russia through political will and strengthening support for Ukraine through financial measures and security guarantees. These efforts aim to exert economic pressure on Russia while securing Ukraine’s future, though challenges remain in achieving consensus and ensuring necessary international backing.

    Add a comment

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Secret Link